In the News

Haynes and Boone’s Arthur Carter Elected Fellow in College of Labor and Employment Lawyers

Arthur Carter, a partner in the Dallas office of Haynes and Boone, LLP has been elected to the College of Labor and Employment Lawyers as a fellow in the 2009 class and will be inducted at the Annual Installation to take place in Washington, D.C. later this year. >>

Chambers USA Recognizes Haynes and Boone Lawyers, Practices

Chambers USA: America’s Leading Lawyers for Business 2009 has singled out 36 Haynes and Boone, LLP lawyers in 16 practices for recognition in its annual law firm rankings. The firm was also honored for having 13 separate areas of practice that lead at the state and national levels. >>



Recent Publications

Weathering the Storm: Options to Remove Liabilities for High Retiree Medical Costs from a Company’s Balance Sheet: VEBAs

High legacy costs for retiree medical benefits, along with Financial Accounting Standards Board Standard No. 158, which requires balance sheet recognition of such liability, has forced many companies to face the true size of the retiree medical obligations and to consider ways to reduce or limit costs. >>

Weathering the Storm: Retiree Benefits and Section 1114

Retiree benefits are often a central issue in bankruptcy cases. For many employers the high cost of retiree medical benefits has been a significant contributing factor to the Chapter 11 filing and a matter of ongoing concern if the debtor is to be able to successfully reorganize. Understandably, employees, retirees and unions are equally concerned about the status of retiree benefits. This alert discusses Section 1114 of the Bankruptcy Code. >>

Supreme Court Holds That Employees Under Collective Bargaining Agreement Are Blocked From Going to Court On Age Discrimination Claims, Must Arbitrate Instead

In 14 Penn Plaza LLC v. Pyett, a decision with significant practical ramifications for unionized employers, the United States Supreme Court, on April 1, 2009, held that employees covered under a collective bargaining agreement were required to arbitrate claims of age discrimination under the arbitration clause of that agreement instead of allowing them to sue in Court. >>

President Obama Signs Fourth Executive Order Concerning Unions

On February 6, 2009, President Barack Obama signed his fourth executive order concerning federal contractors and labor matters. This order (the “Order”) encourages federal agencies contracting with private businesses for large-scale construction projects to mandate project labor agreements (“PLA”) for the entirety of the project.  >>



Arthur T. Carter

Partner

Dallas


2323 Victory Avenue
Suite 700
Dallas, Texas 75219
T +1 214.651.5683
F +1 214.200.0393

Areas of Practice

Education

  • J.D., University of South Dakota, 1976, Lead Articles Editor, South Dakota Law Review
  • B.A., University of Minnesota, 1973

Bar Admissions

  • Texas
  • South Dakota
  • Nebraska
  • Arizona

Court Admissions

  • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas
  • U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas
  • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
  • U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Arthur Carter is Board Certified, Labor and Employment Law, Texas Board of Legal Specialization, and Adjunct Professor of Labor Law Dedman School of Law, Southern Methodist University. He has more than 30 years of traditional labor law experience, and advises clients on the labor law aspects of complex business transactions including mergers, acquisitions, asset and stock sales, business reorganizations and bankruptcy. He also counsels employers on strategic considerations relating to collective bargaining and labor relations, and regularly serves as principal spokesman for management in labor contract negotiations. In litigation matters, he handles whistle blower complaints under the health safety and environmental laws administered by OSHA, wrongful discharge, breach of employment contract, employment discrimination, employment-related torts and restrictive covenants.

Arthur has represented employers in cases in the federal and state courts of Texas, Arizona and Nebraska and several U.S. District Courts including the District of Alaska, Central and Eastern Districts of California, District of Minnesota, Eastern and Western District of Missouri, District of New Mexico, Eastern District of New York and Western District of Oklahoma. Additionally, he has handled matters for employers with several of the Regional Offices of the NLRB throughout the country, and other administrative agencies such as the U.S. Department of Labor, the EEOC, and OSHA.

Selected Client Representations:

  • Advice and counsel to debtors, and holders of debt or equity on labor and employment issues in bankruptcy, compliance with Section 1113 of the Bankruptcy Code, the negotiations of collective bargaining agreements, labor options and related litigation.

  • Advice, counsel, and necessary drafting concerning labor issues attendant to the acquisition, sale and reorganization of business enterprises; and regarding asset purchase, stock purchase and merger agreements.

  • Labor contract negotiations for employers in Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Missouri, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Virginia with various unions including CWA, UAW, IAM, USW, Teamsters, and Operating Engineers Union.

  • Labor arbitrations for employers involving safety rules, seniority, drug testing, subcontracting, contract interpretation, jurisdictional disputes, return to work requirements, setting of incentive rates, and discharge.

  • Defense of employers in NLRB Unfair Labor Practice proceedings, related subpoena enforcement litigation, and pre-election hearings involving bargaining unit issues.

  • Defense of employers under Department of Labor procedures concerning alleged retaliation against health, safety, and environmental whistleblowers.

  • Defense litigation in United States District Court for the Northern and Western Districts of Texas involving wage-hour, ADA, Title VII, WARN, racial harassment and defamation claims.

  • Advice concerning and drafting of employment contracts for highly compensated executives.

Arthur is a contributing author to 3rd through 6th Editions, 2008 Supplement, Elkouri and Elkouri: How Arbitration Works (BNA Books).

Honors

  • Chambers USA America's Leading Lawyers for Business/Labor Law 2007, 2008, 2009
  • Who's Who Legal, Texas, Management Labour & Employment 2007, 2008, 2009 
  • Member of the Haynes and Boone team that handled the complex asset purchase and reorganization of a company bought out of bankruptcy, for which the firm was awarded Global M&A Network's 2009 Turnaround Atlas Award of the Year for deals above $100 million
  • A Fellow of the College of Labor and Employment Lawyers
  • Named a Texas Super Lawyer for Employment & Labor, 2009

Selected Representative Experience


Advising a Major Health Care Provider
Provided advice and counsel concerning issues relating to unfair labor practices, challenging neutrality agreement and access policies. Provided advice relating to arbitration regarding labor contract and employee relations issues.

Representation of Large Medical Center
Successful representation of hospital in NLRB-conducted election in RN unit. Hospital prevailed by a 2-to-1 margin with a bargaining unit of nearly 800 employees. Successful defense of numerous unfair labor practice claims arising out of union campaign, relating to alleged unlawful discharges, interference with employee rights and challenges to solicitation, distribution and access policies. Provided follow-up advice and counsel, supervisory and management training.

Representation of Majority Secured Lender in Chapter 11 Case - Manufacturer of Tissue Products
Represented the majority secured lender in the Chapter 11 case, filed on Newark, New Jersey, of a leading manufacturer of tissue products with a strong presence in the Northeast.

Memberships

  • American Bar Association, Section of Labor and Employment Law
  • Committee on the Development of the Law Under the National Labor Relations Act
  • Committee on ADR in Labor and Employment Law
  • Section of Litigation, Committee on Employment and Labor Relations Law

Online Publications

07/31/2009 - Employers Beware: Unions Win Battle in War Over E-Mail Use
With the advent of information technology, union supporters have frequently used employer e-mail systems to solicit support during union organizing campaigns. Recognizing the difficulty in monitoring these activities, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), in Register-Guard, concluded that employees have no statutory right to use an employer’s e-mail system for union-related activities.

06/19/2009 - U.S. Supreme Court Increases Employee Burden of Proof in Age Bias Cases
In Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc., decided on June 18, 2009, a deeply divided U.S. Supreme Court imposed a heightened proof burden on employees to establish age discrimination against their employers. In a 5-4 decision, the Court concluded that the literal text of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”) does not allow a worker to prove discrimination by demonstrating that age was one “motivating factor” for the employer's adverse employment action.

06/19/2009 - Weathering the Storm: Options to Remove Liabilities for High Retiree Medical Costs from a Company’s Balance Sheet: VEBAs
High legacy costs for retiree medical benefits, along with Financial Accounting Standards Board Standard No. 158, which requires balance sheet recognition of such liability, has forced many companies to face the true size of the retiree medical obligations and to consider ways to reduce or limit costs.

05/27/2009 - Weathering the Storm: Retiree Benefits and Section 1114
Retiree benefits are often a central issue in bankruptcy cases. For many employers the high cost of retiree medical benefits has been a significant contributing factor to the Chapter 11 filing and a matter of ongoing concern if the debtor is to be able to successfully reorganize. Understandably, employees, retirees and unions are equally concerned about the status of retiree benefits. This alert discusses Section 1114 of the Bankruptcy Code.

05/06/2009 - Restructuring Compensation During Economic Challenges
Employers are facing a number of economic and financial challenges. Some employers have considered restructuring their compensation arrangements with employees as an alternative to avoid a reduction in force or layoffs. Restructuring of compensation packages raises a number of issues. 

04/22/2009 - Texas Supreme Court Provides Greater Protection to Employers Seeking to Enforce Non-Compete Covenants
Building on its 2006 decision in Alex Sheshunoff Management Services, L.P. v. Johnson, 209 S.W.3d 644 (Tex. 2006), the Texas Supreme Court has further expanded the enforceability of non-compete covenants in the at-will employment setting. In Mann Frankfort Stein & Lipp Advisors, Inc. v. Fielding, No. 07-0490 (Tex. April 17, 2009), a decision with significant practical implications for Texas employers, the court held that an employer’s implied promise to provide confidential information to an at-will employee may give rise to an enforceable covenant not to compete.

04/09/2009 - Weathering the Storm: Terminations, Uncertainty, and Strategies to Reduce Workplace Liability
In the current economic state, many employers are seeking to reduce operating costs. More employees are being let go as corporate layoffs have accelerated and workers are looking to complain that they have been unfairly or improperly dismissed. The Obama administration has publicly announced that it will be more aggressive in enforcing employment laws.

04/03/2009 - Supreme Court Holds That Employees Under Collective Bargaining Agreement Are Blocked From Going to Court On Age Discrimination Claims, Must Arbitrate Instead
In 14 Penn Plaza LLC v. Pyett, a decision with significant practical ramifications for unionized employers, the United States Supreme Court, on April 1, 2009, held that employees covered under a collective bargaining agreement were required to arbitrate claims of age discrimination under the arbitration clause of that agreement instead of allowing them to sue in Court.

03/04/2009 - President Obama Signs Fourth Executive Order Concerning Unions
On February 6, 2009, President Barack Obama signed his fourth executive order concerning federal contractors and labor matters. This order (the “Order”) encourages federal agencies contracting with private businesses for large-scale construction projects to mandate project labor agreements (“PLA”) for the entirety of the project. 

02/16/2009 - U.S. Supreme Court Protects Workers from Retaliation in Workplace Discrimination Investigations
On January 26, 2009, the United States Supreme Court, in Crawford v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee, concluded that Title VII’s anti-retaliation provision protects an employee-witness who “speaks out” about alleged discrimination “not on the employee’s own initiative,” but in answering questions during the employer’s internal investigation.

02/05/2009 - President Obama Signs Three Executive Orders Concerning Unions
On Friday, January 30, 2009, in a move targeting Bush-era policies that some viewed as unfriendly to organized labor, President Barack Obama signed three executive orders: Notification of Employee Rights Under Federal Labor Laws; Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers Under Service Contracts; and Economy in Government Contracting. Regarding these orders, President Obama commented, “We need to level the playing field for workers and the unions that represent their interests. . .”

01/30/2009 - President Obama Signs Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act
On Thursday, January 29, 2009, in a widely anticipated move, President Barack Obama signed his first bill into law, approving the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act. This legislation focuses on salary bias in the workplace. Discussed in greater detail below, the Ledbetter bill essentially negates a 2007 United States Supreme Court decision that limited a woman’s ability to sue for pay discrimination long after the first discriminatory paycheck occurred.

01/20/2009 - House Passes Two “Fair Pay” Bills
On January 9, 2009, the United States House of Representatives passed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act and the Paycheck Fairness Act. The bills now go to the Senate for consideration, and President Obama is expected to sign both into law should they reach his desk.

11/21/2008 - The ADA’s Rebirth: Complying with the ADA Amendments of 2008
Based on several new amendments to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the statute has been reborn – it offers vastly expanded coverage to a wide variety of employee physical and mental impairments and will require employers to focus on creating and offering reasonable accommodations to individuals with disabilities. On January 1, 2009, the ADA Amendments Act of 2008 (ADAAA) will become effective and, in large part, it removes an employer’s common defense that the individual’s particular impairment does not constitute a “disability” under the ADA.

05/30/2006 - IRS Compliance Check Questionnaire Sent to 600 Tax-Exempt Hospitals

05/05/2006 - Possible NLRA Implications - Part II

04/26/2006 - Possible NLRA Implications - Part I

03/01/2005 - Tips for Managers and Owners To Control and Regulate Access to Property

12/01/1999 - NLRB Rules House Staff Are "Employees" and May Bargain Collectively