In the News

Haynes and Boone Wins Texas Supreme Court Ruling on Demand Letter in Derivative Case

Note to plaintiffs attorneys thinking of filing a derivative suit in Texas: Make sure your demand letter to the board has some meat to it. >>

Haynes and Boone Secures Significant Victory Involving Shareholder Derivative Suits and Demand Letters

The Texas Supreme Court has issued a decision in favor of Lancer Corporation directors, represented by Haynes and Boone, LLP, in a precedent-setting ruling on shareholder derivative suits involving Texas corporations. The decision marks the first ruling by the Texas Supreme Court on the strict statutory prerequisites for commencing shareholder derivative litigation and represents a significant victory for businesses that elect to incorporate under the laws of Texas. >>



Debbie J. McComas

Partner

Dallas


2323 Victory Avenue
Suite 700
Dallas, Texas 75219
T +1 214.651.5375
F +1 214.200.0525

Areas of Practice

Education

  • J.D., Tulane University, 1995, cum laude; Managing Editor, Tulane Maritime Law Journal; Associate Justice, Tulane Moot Court Board
  • B.A., Austin College, 1990, with honors

Bar Admissions

  • Texas

Languages

  • English
  • French

Debbie McComas bridges the gap between the trial and appellate courts. Her extensive knowledge of both state and federal procedure and her ability to quickly grasp facts and legal issues allows her to step in, often on the eve of trial, and serve an invaluable role advocating legal positions and preserving error for appeal, from pretrial motions to preparation of the jury charge. Her legal advocacy before the trial court frequently results in the elimination or the reduction of claims submitted to the jury. If an appeal is necessary, Ms. McComas's involvement in the trial court results in a seamless transition from trial to appeal, where her written and oral advocacy skills have resulted in successful opinions on issues ranging from class actions to lender liability to intellectual property.

For instance, Ms. McComas recently authored a petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court that was named Brief of the Week by the National Law Journal. She also argued successfully before the Texas Supreme Court in In re Harold Schmitz, a case of first impression interpreting the demand requirements of shareholder derivative actions brought against Texas corporations. But her skills are not limited to oral advocacy at the appellate level. In addition to her appellate experience, Ms. McComas has substantial experience in several substantive legal areas, including:

  • Lender liability. Ms. McComas represents lending institutions in high stakes lender liability lawsuits, including representation of Bank of America in a lawsuit brought by Adelphia Communications Corporation and its subsidiaries seeking to hold hundreds of banks liable in tort for the alleged misconduct of Adelphia's officers and directors.
  • International litigation. Applying her expansive knowledge of cross-border jurisdictional issues, Ms. McComas advises lending institutions on strategies for obtaining and enforcing judgments against foreign nationals both in the United States and abroad, including representation of the Export-Import Bank of the United States in international efforts to collect a more than $140 million judgment against a group of Indonesian companies.
  • Intellectual property. Ms. McComas is actively involved in intellectual property litigation, assisting in preservation in the trial court and participating in numerous appeals to the United States Federal Circuit. Ms. McComas was part of the trial team that recently obtained a judgment of non-infringement for Viewpointe Archive Services, LLC, a company accused of joint infringement of check-imaging technology. Further, as a member of the Federal Circuit Bar Association's model patent jury charge sub-committee, Ms. McComas was actively involved in drafting the current Federal Circuit Bar Association's Model Patent Jury Charge.

Professional Recognition

  • Rising Star among appellate lawyers, Texas Monthly (2004-2008)

Professional Leadership

  • Sub-Committee Member, Federal Circuit Bar Association, Model Patent Jury Charge (2008 – present)

  • Co-Chair, Dallas Bar Association Judiciary Committee (2006)

  • Co-Vice Chair, Dallas Bar Association Judiciary Committee (2005)

  • Co-Chair, Dallas Bar Association Judicial Evaluation Poll SubCommittee (2003, 2004)

Selected Representative Experience


Lancer Corporation Derivative Litigation (In re Schmitz)
Appeared before the Texas Supreme Court on an issue of first impression involving the sufficiency of a letter to satisfy pre-suit demand requirements for a shareholder derivative action under the Texas Business Corporation Act. The Texas Supreme Court found the challenged demand letter to be insufficient and ordered the trial court to dismiss the suit. In re Schmitz, 285 S.W.3d 451 (Tex. 2009)

In re Schmitz, 285 S.W.3d 451 (Tex. 2009)
In a significant victory for businesses that elect to incorporate under the laws of Texas, obtained the first ruling by the Texas Supreme Court on the strict statutory prerequisites for commencing shareholder derivative litigation.

Adelphia Communications v. Bank of America, 1:03-md-01529-LMM (S.D.N.Y.)
Represented one of the nation's largest lending institutions in a $10 billion adversary proceeding stemming from the Adelphia Communications Corporation bankruptcy, including handling multiple appeals to the Southern District of New York and the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.

In re Kimberly Clark Corporation, 228 S.W.3d 480 (Tex. App. - Dallas 2007, orig. proceeding)
Obtained a writ of mandamus ordering a trial court to dissolve its discovery order permitting intrusive environmental testing on defendant’s property.

Chase Medical v. CHF Technologies, No. 3:04-cv-02570 (N.D. Tex. 2007)
On behalf of a company that supplies products used in ventricular heart reconstructive surgery, assisted in preserving error and preparing the jury charge in a patent infringement suit, resulting in a $2 million judgment as well as an injunction against the use or sale of the infringing product.

Reynolds v. Murphy, 188 S.W.3d 252 (Tex. App. - Fort Worth 2006, pet. denied)
Obtained the first appellate opinion in Texas protecting the First Amendment rights of a newsletter publisher and author to publish general investment advice.

In re Tyco Electronics Power Systems, No. 05-04-01808-CV, 2005 WL 237232 (Tex. App. --Dallas Feb. 2, 2005, orig. proceeding) (not designated for publication)
In a mandamus proceeding in the Dallas Court of Appeals and the Texas Supreme Court, litigated the enforceability of a forum selection clause contained in an employment non-compete agreement.

Air Routing International Corp. (Canada) v. Britannia Airways, 150 S.W.3d 682 (Tex. App. - Houston [14th Dist.] 2004, no pet.)
Assisted with preserving error, preparing the jury charge, and drafting appellate court briefing in a multi-million dollar international fraud and conspiracy case involving the airline industry, resulting in a take-nothing jury verdict; obtained reversal of the trial court’s order denying a request for attorneys' fees.

Kondos v. Lincoln Property Co., 110 S.W.3d 716 (Tex. App. - Dallas 2003, no pet.)
In a case of first impression under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, obtained reversal of an order certifying a class of more than 60,000 members who alleged “junk faxing” by a company that owns apartment complexes.

Bolle, Inc. v. American Greetings Corp., 109 S.W.3d 827 (Tex. App. - Dallas 2003, pet. denied)
Successfully defended a judgment setting aside an agreement on the basis of mutual mistake, in a case challenging the application of a contractual release given in one case to unrelated litigation pending in another state.

Stucky v. City of San Antonio, 307 F.3d 315 (5th Cir. 2002), on remand from, 536 U.S. 936 (2002)
Through a petition for certiorari to the United States Supreme Court, upheld a municipality’s right to impose safety regulations on municipal towing services.

City of San Antonio v. Stucky, 307 F.3d 315 (5th Cir. 2002), on remand from, 536 U.S. 936 (2002)
Through a petition for certiorari to the United States Supreme Court, upheld a municipality’s right to impose safety regulations on municipal towing services.

Lonza AG v. Blum, 70 S.W.3d 184 (Tex. App. - San Antonio 2001, pet. denied)
In a case that redefined the standard of review applied by the San Antonio Court of Appeals in cases involving personal jurisdiction over foreign corporations obtained reversal of a trial court’s order denying a Swiss corporation’s special appearance in a wrongful termination suit alleging fraud and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

McCutchin v. Addison Texas Tumbleweed, Inc., No. 05-98-01918-CV, 2001 WL 910940 (Tex. App. - Dallas Aug. 13, 2001, pet. denied) (mem. op.)
Obtained reversal of an adverse $1.2 million judgment in a wrongful eviction case and obtained a $100,000 judgment in favor of our client.

Barnett v. Network Solutions, Inc., 38 S.W.3d 200 (Tex. App. - Eastland 2001, pet. denied)
Successfully defended an appellate challenge to a judgment enforcing venue provisions in an online "click-wrap" agreement.

Mayhew v. Town of Sunnyvale, 964 S.W.2d 922 (Tex. 1998)
Won reversal of a multi-million dollar judgment in a zoning dispute against a Texas municipality.

Adelphia
Represented Bank of America, as agent for $2.5 billion credit facility owed by various Adelphia entities, in Adelphia’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy case. Successfully obtained payment in cash in full for clients when cable operations were sold to Time Warner and Comcast. Continue to represent Bank in related litigation.

$2.48 Billion Multi-Facility Finance - Cable Company
Represented the administrative agent in connection with the workout and eventual bankruptcy of a cable television company, resulting in a 100 percent collection of all indebtedness (subject to continuing litigation).

Online Publications

05/22/2009 - Haynes and Boone Represents Victorious Directors in Texas Supreme Court Ruling on Shareholder Derivative Suits and Demand Letters
Today the Texas Supreme Court issued a ground-breaking ruling on shareholder derivative suits against Texas corporations. The decision, In re Schmitz, et al., represents the first ruling by the highest court in Texas on the strict statutory prerequisites for commencing shareholder derivative litigation established by the 1997 amendments to the Texas Business Corporations Act (and subsequently incorporated into the more recent Texas Business Organization Code). The Court’s decision represents a significant victory for businesses that elect to incorporate under the laws of Texas. Haynes and Boone, LLP represented the directors of Lancer Corporation, the victorious parties in this case.

06/01/2006 - Appeals in Intellectual Property Matters
Technology is changing so rapidly that the protection of intellectual property rights has become an economic necessity for many businesses...  What does this mean for appellate lawyers?  In an era where traditional business tort litigation may be waning, intellectual property rights litigation is soaring with the types of bet-the-company cases that merit the expertise of an appellate specialist... This paper serves as a guideline to the three primary areas of intellectual property law from an appellate lawyer’s perspective.

02/01/2006 - The Art of Preservation in Patent Infringement Lawsuits: The Benefits of Appellate Counsel in the Trial Court
This paper highlights the procedural steps to preserving issues for appeal in patent infringement lawsuits and provides strategical suggestions on how best to use these steps (and an appellate lawyer) during the litigation process.

09/07/2005 - Preserving Error Before Trial
“To preserve a complaint for appellate review, a party must present to the trial court a timely request, motion, or objection, state the specific grounds therefore, and obtain a ruling.”

08/25/2004 - Post-Verdict Preservation of Error

05/01/2000 - Appellate Practice