In the News

Chambers USA Recognizes Haynes and Boone Lawyers, Practices

Chambers USA: America’s Leading Lawyers for Business 2009 has singled out 36 Haynes and Boone, LLP lawyers in 16 practices for recognition in its annual law firm rankings. The firm was also honored for having 13 separate areas of practice that lead at the state and national levels. >>

Dallas Lawyers Auxiliary Presents Justinian Award for Community Service to Haynes and Boone’s George Bramblett

George Bramblett has been selected to receive the Dallas Lawyers Auxiliary’s 27th annual Justinian Award honoring dedication to community service. Mr. Bramblett is the third Haynes and Boone partner to receive the Justinian Award, following in the footsteps of founding partners Richard Haynes, honored in 1989, and Mike Boone, selected in 2004. Haynes and Boone is believed to be the only firm to see three of its partners bestowed with this prestigious honor. >>



George W. Bramblett Jr.

Partner

Dallas


2323 Victory Avenue
Suite 700
Dallas, Texas 75219
T +1 214.651.5574
F +1 214.200.0374

Areas of Practice

Education

  • J.D., Southern Methodist University, 1966, Captain, National Moot Court Team, Journal of Air Law and Commerce
  • B.A., Southern Methodist University, 1963

Bar Admissions

  • Texas

George Bramblett is a trial lawyer. He has been involved in high profile, high stakes litigation in Texas. He was selected Trial Lawyer of the Year by the Dallas Bar Association for 2001. He is a frequent CLE speaker and has written extensively on courtroom procedures, including "The Court's Charge," and The Ultimate Trial Notebook, written for the State Bar of Texas.

He has had an extensive and diverse trial practice for more than thirty years. He has represented clients in the full range of business, commercial and tort litigation. He also has significant experience in the general area of securities and shareholder litigation.

In 2009, Mr. Bramblett was selected to receive the Dallas Lawyers Auxiliary's 27th annual Justinian Award honoring dedication to community service. Also in 2009, Mr. Bramblett was named one of The Best Lawyers in America in Bet-the-Company Litigation; Commercial Litigation; Legal Malpractice Law; and Securities Law. He has been in The Best Lawyers in America for more than 10 years. He was named a Texas Super Lawyer each year from 2003 to 2009, and one of the Top 10 lawyers in the state in 2003 and 2004 according to Texas Monthly magazine. He also was named one of the "Best Lawyers in Dallas" by D Magazine each year from 2003 to 2009.

His engagements include the following:

  • Representation of Exxon in its successful claim for insurance coverage against certain underwriters at Lloyds of London growing out of the Valdez oil spill in Alaska.
  • Prevailed in school finance litigation on behalf of property rich districts in Texas; system was declared unconstitutional; legislature was given deadline to correct constitutional deficiencies; litigation involved a six-week trial and two opinions from the Texas Supreme Court. West Orange-Cove Consolidated ISD v. Neeley, 107 S.W.3d 558 (Tex. 2003); 176 S.W.3d 746 (Tex. 2005).
  • Secured temporary injunction for nationwide protection against business disruptions and tortious conduct at annual shareholders meeting and business operations which resulted in a consent judgment against Greenpeace Inc. Exxon Mobil v. Greenpeace, 133 S.W.3d 804 (Tex. App.-Dallas 2004).
  • Representation of Trustees against claims of breach of trust, fiduciary duties by claimed beneficiaries who attempted to block and disrupt transactions by the Trustee.
  • Defended and obtained summary judgment on behalf of major real estate management company of class action seeking over $100 million in damages for alleged violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Kondos v. Lincoln Property, 110 S.W.3d 716 (Tex. App.-Dallas 2003).
  • Successful representation of major national law firms in legal malpractice cases involving business and securities matters.
  • Representation of lawyers in a dispute growing out of dissolution of a law firm.
  • Defense of major investment banking firm in securities fraud class action involving Enron Corporation. Regents of the University of California v. Credit Swisse First Boston, Cause. No. 06-20856 (5th Cir. March 19, 2007, cert. pending).
  • Representation of mortgage real estate investment trust that invested in mortgage securities in twenty-four consolidated suits brought as class action alleging federal securities law violations.
  • Successful defense of claims under employee retention plan Biko v. Siemens, __ S.W.3d __ (Tex. App.-Dallas 2007).

Professional Recognition

  • Recognized by Chambers USA 2009 as one of the leading practitioners in the United States for Litigation:  General Commercial
  • Dallas Lawyers Auxiliary Justinian Award, 2009
  • Recognized as a Best Business Lawyer in Dallas for Business Litigation, D Magazine, 2009
  • Dallas Bar Foundation Fellows Award, 2008
  • SMU Law School Distinguished Alumni Award for Private Practice, 2001
  • Anti-Defamation League, Jurisprudence Award, September 2005
  • Dallas Bar Association: Trial Lawyer of the Year, 2001
  • Hall of Fame, Baylor College of Dentistry, 2003
  • Fall Commencement Speaker, University of North Texas, December 17, 1994

Community Involvement

  • Board of Trustees, The Hillcrest Foundation 2008
  • Member, Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board of the Texas College and University System of Texas 1983-91
  • Chair, Board of Trustees, Baylor College of Dentistry
  • Chair, Board of Trustees, Baylor Oral Health Foundation 1994-
  • Board of Trustees, Southwestern Medical Foundation 1997-
  • Chair, Board of Trustees, Phi Gamma Delta Educational Foundation
  • Chair, Board of Directors, Alliance for Higher Education, Chair 1999-2000

Selected Representative Experience


Lancer Corporation Derivative Litigation (In re Schmitz)
Appeared before the Texas Supreme Court on an issue of first impression involving the sufficiency of a letter to satisfy pre-suit demand requirements for a shareholder derivative action under the Texas Business Corporation Act. The Texas Supreme Court found the challenged demand letter to be insufficient and ordered the trial court to dismiss the suit. In re Schmitz, 285 S.W.3d 451 (Tex. 2009)

In re Schmitz, 285 S.W.3d 451 (Tex. 2009)
In a significant victory for businesses that elect to incorporate under the laws of Texas, obtained the first ruling by the Texas Supreme Court on the strict statutory prerequisites for commencing shareholder derivative litigation.

Frozen Food Express Derivative Litigation
Represented special litigation committee of one of the country's largest temperature-controlled transportation services companies in investigating breach of fiduciary duty claims arising from related-party transactions.

Neeley v. West Orange-Cove Consolidated Independent School District, 176 S.W.3d 746 (Tex. 2005)
Persuaded the Texas Supreme Court to strike down the Texas public school finance system on constitutional grounds; this decision was the culmination of a four- and-a-half year effort, including a previous successful appeal to the Texas Supreme Court and a successful five-week bench trial.

Greenpeace, Inc. v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 133 S.W.3d 804 (Tex. App. —Dallas 2004, pet. denied)
Upheld a nationwide temporary injunction preventing illegal and tortious conduct by Greenpeace against ExxonMobil facilities following an unlawful entry by Greenpeace activists at ExxonMobil headquarters.

Kondos v. Lincoln Property Co., 110 S.W.3d 716 (Tex. App. - Dallas 2003, no pet.)
In a case of first impression under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, obtained reversal of an order certifying a class of more than 60,000 members who alleged “junk faxing” by a company that owns apartment complexes.

Bolle, Inc. v. American Greetings Corp., 109 S.W.3d 827 (Tex. App. - Dallas 2003, pet. denied)
Successfully defended a judgment setting aside an agreement on the basis of mutual mistake, in a case challenging the application of a contractual release given in one case to unrelated litigation pending in another state.

West Orange-Cove Consolidated Independent School District v. Alanis, 107 S.W.3d 558 (Tex. 2003)
Obtained a ruling reinstating a constitutional challenge to Texas’ public school finance system, following the lower courts’ dismissal of the case on ripeness grounds.

Intelect, Inc. Securities Litigation
Successfully opposed class certification in an action brought under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 against a manufacturer of fiber-optic, multi-service access platform products and video communication products arising out of a restatement of the company’s quarterly financial results. The court denied class certification on the ground that the proposed class representatives were inadequate. Umsted v. Intelect, Inc., 2003 WL 79750 (N.D. Tex. Jan. 7, 2003).

Exxon Corp. v. Lloyds of London, No. 93-40252, (189th Dist. Ct., Harris County, Tex.)
Acted as counsel in charge of legal proceedings (including summary judgments, privilege disputes, removal and remand, and the jury charge) for Exxon Corporation in its suit against Lloyds of London for failure to provide insurance coverage for the grounding of the Valdez; the trial resulted in a judgment for $420 million.

City of Dallas v. Continental Airlines, Inc., 735 S.W.2d 496 (Tex. App. - Dallas 1987, writ denied)
Obtained summary judgment entitling Continental Airlines to fly out of Dallas Love Field and successfully defended that judgment on appeal.

Chapter 11 Representation - ASARCO LLC
Represent the corporate parent of ASARCO LLC, a copper miner and smelter which filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in Corpus Christi, Texas with approximately $10 billion in claims. Following Chapter 11 filing, ASARCO filed a fraudulent transfer action against Americas Mining Corp., seeking recovery of several billion dollars.

Memberships

  • Fellow, American College of Trial Lawyers (Texas State Chair)
  • Fellow, American Board of Trial Advocates (President of Dallas Chapter)
  • Fellow, International Academy of Trial Lawyers
  • Fellow, International Academy of Barristers
  • Master and Former President, William Mac Taylor American Inns of Court (112th)

Online Publications

05/22/2009 - Haynes and Boone Represents Victorious Directors in Texas Supreme Court Ruling on Shareholder Derivative Suits and Demand Letters
Today the Texas Supreme Court issued a ground-breaking ruling on shareholder derivative suits against Texas corporations. The decision, In re Schmitz, et al., represents the first ruling by the highest court in Texas on the strict statutory prerequisites for commencing shareholder derivative litigation established by the 1997 amendments to the Texas Business Corporations Act (and subsequently incorporated into the more recent Texas Business Organization Code). The Court’s decision represents a significant victory for businesses that elect to incorporate under the laws of Texas. Haynes and Boone, LLP represented the directors of Lancer Corporation, the victorious parties in this case.

01/16/2008 - Supreme Court Rejects "Scheme Liability" Theory in Securities Class Actions
In a 5-3 decision, the Court squarely rejected efforts to bring securities class actions based on “scheme liability” against secondary actors – such as lawyers, lenders, investment banks, accountants, vendors – that enter into transactions with public companies.

11/16/2007 - Haynes and Boone Obtains Denial of Class Certification and Summary Judgment in Securities Case
On November 13, 2007, Haynes and Boone obtained a significant securities litigation victory on behalf of our client Flowserve Corporation. In a lengthy and comprehensive opinion, Judge Boyle of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas denied class certification in a federal securities action filed against Flowserve and other Defendants, concluding that the Plaintiffs could not demonstrate loss causation on their Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 claims.

09/10/2007 - Central Laborers' Pension Fund v. Integrated Electrical Services Inc.
The Fifth Circuit recently issued a decision applying Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd., 127 S. Ct. 2499 (2007), as to the sufficiency of scienter allegations under the pleading requirements of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (“PSLRA”). See Central Laborers’ Pension Fund v. Integrated Electrical Services Inc., No. 06-20135 (5th Cir. Aug. 21, 2007).

04/19/2007 - Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plans Face Scrutiny
Rule 10b5-1 plan participants, beware. The SEC recently indicated its increased focus on what it perceives as potential abuse of pre-arranged trading plans under Rule 10b5-1. By design, Rule 10b5-1 protects executives’ trades executed pursuant to a pre-arranged trading plan established while the executive was not in possession of material nonpublic information.

03/22/2007 - Enron Appellate Ruling Rejects Class Certification
Fifth Circuit Holds Secondary Actors Cannot Be Primarily Liable Under Securities Laws For Conduct Alone

07/20/2006 - Analysis of Texas Supreme Court's opinion in Neeley et al. v. West Orange-Cove et al., 176 S.W.3d 74

11/28/2005 - Analysis of Texas Supreme Court’s opinion in Neeley et al. v. West Orange-Cove et al.

03/10/2005 - I Can’t Find This in the *!?#%* PJC! Jury Questions and Instructions That The Business Litigator Needs - But Aren’t In The PJC.
Pattern instructions do not and cannot contain all possible jury questions and instructions a court or practitioner may need in a case. Why not? Reasons vary, including...

01/01/2001 - The Court's Charge