In the News

Haynes and Boone Attorneys Widely Recognized by Texas Super Lawyers

DALLAS – Ninety-three Haynes and Boone, LLP attorneys were recognized in 2011 by Texas Super Lawyers. >>

Beaumont Appeals Court Reverses Judgment in Haynes and Boone Pro Bono Matter

HOUSTON – A Beaumont, Texas appeals court has set aside an order evicting a multiple sclerosis patient from her Jefferson County apartment in a pro bono matter handled by Haynes and Boone, LLP appellate lawyers.

Houston appellate lawyers Jeff Nobles and Polly Graham successfully argued the default judgment was improper because it was rendered while Haynes and Boone’s client was hospitalized with a chronic illness and that the client had meritorious defenses the trial court failed to consider. On Jan. 27, the Ninth Court of Appeals in Beaumont issued an opinion that reversed the judgment of the trial court and remanded the case for a new trial.
>>

SNPA Files Friend-of-the-Court Brief with Federal Appeals Court in Atlanta

On June 4, Jeff Nobles, an appellate specialist at Haynes and Boone in Houston, filed the latest SNPA brief with the federal appeals court in Atlanta in support of courtroom access and courthouse reporting rights. >>



Jeffery T. Nobles

Of Counsel

Houston


1 Houston Center
1221 McKinney Street
Suite 2100
Houston, Texas 77010
T +1 713.547.2589
F +1 713.236.5500

Areas of Practice

Education

  • J.D., Baylor University School of Law, 1986
  • A.B., History, Princeton University, 1980
  • North American Ministerial Fellow in the Master of Divinity Program, Union Theological Seminary of New York City, 1981

Bar Admissions

  • Texas

Court Admissions

  • U.S. Supreme Court
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
  • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas
  • U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas
  • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
  • U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas
  • U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Judicial Clerkships

Briefing attorney for the Honorable Bud Warren, First Court of Appeals [Houston] 1986-87; Staff Attorney, First Court of Appeals [Houston] 1989-90

In October 2008, Jeff Nobles celebrated his homecoming to Haynes and Boone, where he practiced from 1991 to 1997. Mr. Nobles' record of success in difficult appeals has earned him the loyalty of clients and referral sources, the respect of peers, and cases that occasionally involve colorful issues.
 
As lead appellate counsel and as a member of litigation teams, Mr. Nobles has helped clients prevail in appeals from large money judgments; emergency challenges to discovery and sanctions orders; cases involving significant constitutional issues; trials requiring highly technical expertise in the preparation of jury charges and he formation of judgments; and other complex legal matters.

In the last decade, Mr. Nobles has helped his clients overturn a number of erroneous judgments exceeding $40 million. Over the same period, his advocacy and counseling have helped clients obtain favorable judgments or settlements worth well more than $30 million.

Mr. Nobles' work for clients in challenging cases and emergency proceedings has developed his expertise in two areas: superseding the enforcement of judgments and handling mandamus challenges to pretrial rulings.

In numerous state and federal appeals, Mr. Nobles has won orders superseding the enforcement of judgment by posting alternate security or a reduced supersedeas bond. These appellate rulings have allowed clients to afford appeals and to preserve their assets.

In mandamus cases, Mr. Nobles has helped clients win appellate rulings reversing erroneous orders by trial courts relating to pretrial discovery, arbitration, and sanctions. These mandamus rulings have changed the momentum of pretrial proceedings and helped place clients on equal footing in difficult venues.

Professional Recognition

  • Board Certified in Civil Appellate Law, Texas Board of Legal Specialization
  • Texas Super Lawyer in Civil Appellate Law, Texas Monthly magazine, 2003-2011
  • “Comment: Texas trial judges see healthy system,” San Antonio Express-News, November 10, 2007
  • “Preservation of Error in Offering and Excluding Evidence,” How To Offer And Exclude Evidence, University of Houston Law Foundation, March 2008
  • “The Jury Charge: Including Submission of Duty Issues,” Toxic Tort and Other Mass Tort Litigation, University of Houston Law Foundation, June 2005
  • “Ten Things Every Lawyer Should Know About Texas Civil Appeals,” Houston Bar Association Friday Seminar, March 2002
  • “Efficient & Effective Legal Research,” South Texas College of Law, December 2001
  • “Texas Courts of Appeals Update,” University of Texas School of Law, 11th Annual Conference on State and Federal Appeals, May 2001
  • Are Unpublished Opinions Unconstitutional? Anastasoff v. United States, 13 The Appellate Advocate, Fall 2000 at 19 (Journal of the State Bar Appellate Practice & Advocacy Section)

Professional Leadership

  • Chair, Houston Bar Association Appellate Section, 1999-2000
  • Fellow, Houston Bar Foundation
  • Chair, Appellate Court Delay Reduction Committee, Houston Bar Association Appellate Practice Section, 2000-2001
  • Director, Gulf Coast Legal Foundation, 1994-1997
  • Member, State Bar of Texas Grievance Committee, 1998-2000
  • Special Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, Texas Commission for Lawyer Discipline, 1997-1998

Selected Representative Experience


In the Interest of J.P.L., ___ S.W.3d ___, 2011 WL 5869456 (Tex. App.--San Antonio, Nov. 23, 2011, no pet. h.)
In an international child custody dispute, successfully obtained mandamus relief setting aside an order that deprived a parent of possession and custody of a child, on the grounds that the order violated due process principles and the international treaties governing service on a parent who resides abroad.

Main v. Royall, No. 05-09-01503-CV (Tex. App.-Dallas July 25, 2011)
Represented amicus curiae in an interlocutory appeal obtaining reversal of the trial court’s order denying summary judgment on defamation claims against two media defendants regarding the book, Bulldozed: 'Kelo,' Eminent Domain and the American Lust for Land.

Chevron Phillips Chemical Co. LP v. Kingwood CrossRoads, L.P., 346 S.W.3d 37 (Tex. App--Houston [14th Dist.] 2011, pet. filed)
In a real estate appeal following a six-week jury trial, obtained reversal of a trial court judgment that had required client to convey a valuable tract of commercial real estate and to pay $2.9 million in fraud damages to a commercial real estate developer.

Heritage Gulf Coast Properties, Ltd. v. Sandalwood Apartments, Inc., No. 2008-64342 (11th Dist. Ct., Harris County, Tex.)
In a lawsuit alleging multi-million dollar claims arising from commercial real estate disputes, assisted trial team with strategy, prepared and argued successful motions for directed verdict, and prepared and argued the jury charge. The trial resulted in a favorable defense verdict that rejected the opponents' claims for breach of fiduciary duties and fraud by non-disclosure.

Barnes v. Stone Way Limited Partnership, 330 S.W.3d 925 (Tex. App.--Beaumont 2011, no pet.)
In a pro bono representation, obtained reversal of a default judgment evicting a low-income tenant from her apartment by persuading the court of appeals that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the tenant's motion for a new trial.

State of Texas v. Clark; No. C-35,136; In the 244th District Court of Ector County, Texas.
In a case of first impression, we filed an emergency motion to quash a subpoena that would have put our client, a newspaper reporter, on the witness stand. Our motion was based on the Texas Free Flow of Information Act, the "shield law" enacted in 2009. During hearings on the eve of trial, we persuaded the district attorney and defense counsel to agree that the reporter would not be called to testify.

Big Dog Logistics v. Strategic Impact, 312 S.W.3d 122 (Tex. App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2010, pet. denied)
In an appeal following a jury trial, obtained reversal of a $2.2 million judgment for alleged breach of a commissions contract between a marketing consultant and our client, a Houston-based company that provides services and solutions to manufacturers, distributors, and shippers with unique logistics needs. The court held there was no evidence that our client entered into the agreement the jury found had been breached.

Stergiou v. General Metal Fabrication Corp., No. 01-01-00691-CV (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2003, pet. denied)
In dispute over ownership of corporation, persuaded trial court to allow client to tender corporate stock into court’s registry as alternate security in lieu of supersedeas bond, which allowed client to avoid loss of corporate control and ultimately obtain reversal of trial court’s judgment.

Freedom Communications, Inc. v. Mancias, 101 F.3d 697 (5th Cir. 1996)
In a case involving First Amendment rights, assisted trial counsel in obtaining reversal of a district court’s order dismissing a newspaper’s suit to unseal court records concerning a candidate for public office.

Freedom Communications, Inc. v. Brand, 907 S.W.2d 614 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1995, no writ)
Assisted trial counsel in obtaining a summary judgment for a newspaper on its First Amendment defenses in a case filed by a public office holder.

Freedom Communications v. Sotelo, 11-05-336-CV, 2006 WL 1644602 (Tex. App.-- Eastland 2006, no pet.)
In an appeal involving the First Amendment’s “fair report” privilege, obtained reversal of the trial court’s order denying summary judgment to a newspaper and its reporter.

Advent Trust Co. v. Hyder, 12 S.W.3d 534 (Tex. App. --San Antonio 1999, pet. denied)
Obtained a stay of execution in the court of appeals, stopping proceedings in the trial court to foreclose on real estate, and ultimately obtained reversal of the trial court’s judgment.

Zarsky Industries, Inc. v. Temptek, Inc., C.A. No. H-96-1133 (S.D. Tex. 1997)
After a federal trial that resulted in a $3.2 million judgment, negotiated a compromise that resulted in a cost-effective stay of enforcement of the judgment pending the district court’s consideration of post-judgment motions.

Freedom Communications v. Cantu, 168 S.W.3d 847 (Tex. 2005)
Obtained reversal of the trial court’s order denying summary judgment to a newspaper and its reporter, on the ground that a headline is not defamatory when it rationally interprets the underlying facts.

Eberhard v. Golden Amer. Life Ins. Co., No. A-03-CA-866-LY (W.D. Tex. 2006)
Obtained an order from a federal district court that Texas state law governed supersedeas issues and limited the bond amount to 50% of net worth, enabling our client to avoid post-judgment garnishment during the appeal.