Recent Publications

Horizontal Cooperation Agreements Between Competitors: Key Features of the Revised EC Guidelines

Last week, the European Commission (“EC”) adopted revised rules for evaluating cooperation agreements between horizontal competitors at the same level in the supply/distribution chain. >>



Michael Warnecke

Partner

Dallas


2323 Victory Avenue
Suite 700
Dallas, Texas 75219
T +1 214.651.5659
F +1 214.200.0689


Michael Warnecke concentrates his practice in the arena of corporate fraud.  Due to the expansive nature of fraud claims, Mike counsels his clients through both criminal and civil charges.  Often, these clients face criminal and civil liability simultaneously.  Accordingly, he must manage complex litigation involving multiple adversaries, multiple jurisdictions, and interrelated issues.  Mike also handles a wide array of business litigation matters.

His experience includes:

  • Representing numerous corporations and executives under federal investigation concerning issues such as antitrust compliance, environmental regulation and reporting, and securities regulation and reporting.

  • Conducting numerous internal investigations for Fortune 500 companies to determine whether employees are engaged in conduct that could lead to both criminal and civil liability such as bribery, fraud, false reporting, and document destruction.

  • Representing the owner of a national healthcare provider in connection with parallel government investigations, a bankruptcy proceeding, three separate state court lawsuits, and an arbitration proceeding involving claims of breach of contract, fraud, and RICO.

  • Representing a global transportation company involved in a parallel federal criminal investigation, suspension proceeding, and a civil qui tam action regarding transactions in the Iraqi theater.

  • Representing an executive regarding insurgent attacks in Iraq.

  • Representing a manufacturing company under state indictment for environmental violations.

  • Representing an executive in connection with federal contempt proceedings arising out of an off shore tax investigation.

  • Representing a global manufacturing and service company in connection with a public federal securities fraud class action lawsuit.

  • Representing a woman indicted for conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud in connection with a racing engine business.

  • Representing an executive in a federal criminal investigation of allegations of bank and securities fraud concerning the company's sales practices.

  • Representing a manufacturing company in a federal criminal investigation of antitrust allegations about the company's distribution network and pricing practices.

  • Representing an environmental testing company executive in a federal criminal investigation of fictitious test results.

  • Representing an executive in an SEC investigation of income recognition issues.

  • Representing a global oil company in a federal criminal investigation of environmental compliance and reporting issues.

  • Representing a corporate manager in a federal criminal prosecution involving environmental regulatory violations, conspiracy charges, and false statement charges.

  • Defending a high tech company in a SEC investigation and two separate shareholder class action suits regarding revenue recognition and other securities issues.

  • Defending a healthcare company against civil RICO, conspiracy, and antitrust claims. This litigation was part of multiple parallel proceedings generated by nationwide FBI and state attorneys general investigations of the company.

  • Representing healthcare providers in arbitrations against HMOs involving claims of breach of contract, fraud, and RICO.

  • Representing both plaintiffs and defendants in numerous business litigation lawsuits involving, for example, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, theft of trade secrets, deceptive trade practices, fraud, and RICO.

Mike is a co-author of State Antitrust Practice and Statutes, Ch. 48, (Texas), ABA Section of Antitrust Law ed., 4th ed. 2009. Copies available at www.abanet.org.

Honors

  • "Texas Rising Stars," 2004-2007 (Law and Politics Magazine and Texas Monthly)
  • "Best Lawyers Under 40 in Dallas " 2005-2006 (D Magazine)

Selected Representative Experience


International Freight Forwarding Antitrust Investigation and Litigation
Representation of major global freight forwarder in an industry-wide international antitrust investigation into possible price fixing and other improper collusive activity.

Defense of Proposed Multi-Billion Dollar Telecommunications Acquisition
Defense of AT&T in merger challenges filed by Sprint and Cellular South against AT&T's proposed acquisition of T-Mobile USA. 

Marine Hose Price-Fixing Investigation
Representation of U.S.-based sales executive of an Italian company in a DOJ criminal antitrust investigation and follow-on civil litigation relating to antitrust violations in the marine hose industry.

DOD False Claims Act and Anti-Kickback Investigation
Representation of major global freight forwarder in qui tam lawsuit and associated False Claims Act and Anti-Kickback Act investigation by Department of Defense Office of Inspector General Defense Criminal Investigative Service into the company’s logistics services in Iraq and elsewhere as subcontractor under the Logistics Civil Augmentation Program (“LOGCAP”) for the DoD.

Memberships

  • American Bar Association Sections of Litigation and Criminal Justice
  • National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
  • American Health Lawyers Association
  • Federal Bar Association
  • State Bar of Texas
  • Dallas Bar Association
  • Fellow of the Texas Bar Foundation

Online Publications

12/21/2009 - Spirit of Cooperation
The Texas Supreme Court has called for cooperation between parties in e-discovery: “A fundamental tenet of our discovery rules is cooperation between parties and their counsel, and the expectation that agreements will be made as reasonably necessary for efficient disposition of the case.” Partners Michael Warnecke and Bill Morrison discuss the implications with Texas Lawyer.

05/01/2009 - A Corporate Crime Wave?
Many in the business community are anxious to know if the global financial crisis will lead to a wave of criminal prosecutions. Indeed, several factors are presently converging to create what some might call the “perfect storm” of corporate criminal law enforcement.

02/13/2007 - Selected Recent Developments in the Enforceabilty of Arbitration Clauses in the Healthcare Context
Recent judicial decisions have upheld challenges to the enforceability of arbitration provisions in contracts with healthcare providers. While some courts have enforced the parties’ agreement to arbitrate, other courts have found arbitration provisions to be inapplicable, unenforceable, or subject to limitations. The results are far from uniform and create uncertainty as to the enforceability of arbitration clauses in the healthcare context.

09/01/2006 - A Company's Dilemma: Advancing Attorney Fees to Employees
Published in Headnotes, Volume 30, Number 9, September 1, 2006 © The Dallas Bar Association

12/09/2005 - Civil Discovery and Spoliation in Texas
In the wake of nationwide corporate accounting scandals and Congress’ response through the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, issues surrounding document retention and destruction have become a lightning rod for the attention of both federal investigators and civil litigants alike.

10/31/2005 - Responding to Allegations of Improper Corporate Conduct
This article discusses two issues critical to any response to allegations of corporate wrongdoing: (1) structuring the internal corporate investigation in a manner that effectively responds to the allegations at issue without subjecting counsel to ethical problems that may appear along the way, and (2) dealing with the government once it launches an investigation into your corporate client, including the client’s obligation to protect relevant documents.

04/12/2005 - Overview of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Organizations and Corporate Compliance Programs
The United States Sentencing Guidelines for Organizations (“the Guidelines”) were promulgated in 1991 to ensure that organizations cannot profit from wrongdoing and to encourage organizations to implement appropriate compliance programs to prevent wrongdoing from occurring in the first place... This article provides and overview of the federal United States Sentencing Guidelines for Organizations.

05/11/2001 - Ethical and Practical Issues Arising In the Face of a Govt. Investigation
Enforcement actions against corporations and their employees are becoming more common, especially criminal enforcement actions. These actions raise several conflict and ethical issues that must be addressed by lawyers defending either the company, the employees, or both. Many of these conflict issues are inherent in any situation where the degree of liability varies across a collection of people or entities. Some of these conflicts arise or are exacerbated, only because of certain aggressive tactics the government uses in its investigations.