In the News

Haynes and Boone Attorneys Widely Recognized by Texas Super Lawyers

DALLAS – Ninety-three Haynes and Boone, LLP attorneys were recognized in 2011 by Texas Super Lawyers. >>

Best Lawyers in America 2012 Honors Firm, Haynes and Boone Lawyers

DALLAS – Ninety-four Haynes and Boone, LLP attorneys have been included in Best Lawyers in America's 2012 ranking of the nation’s top legal talent. >>

Haynes and Boone Highly Recognized By Chambers USA

DALLAS – Fifty Haynes and Boone, LLP lawyers have been recognized by Chambers USA: America’s Leading Lawyers for Business 2011 in its annual law firm rankings. >>

Haynes and Boone Women Attorneys Top D Magazine Best Women Lawyers Ranking

Ten women partners from Haynes and Boone, LLP have been ranked among the 126 attorneys recognized in D Magazine’s Best Women Lawyers in Dallas for 2010. The number of honorees was the most of any law firm.

The attorneys are Deborah Coldwell and Joyce Mazero, selected in franchise and development, Nina Cortell and Sharon Freytag, selected in appellate, Greta Cowart, selected in ERISA, Wei Wei Jeang, selected in intellectual property, Vicki Martin-Odette, selected in tax, Karen Nelson, selected in bank lending, Ann Saegart, selected in commercial real estate and Jan Sharry, selected in corporate finance/mergers.

In Haynes and Boone's 40-year history, the firm has made a commitment to the advancement of women in the workplace. It is ingrained in the firm’s philosophy and bolsters its unique culture of teamwork and outstanding client service. >>



Nina Cortell

Partner

Dallas


2323 Victory Avenue
Suite 700
Dallas, Texas 75219
T +1 214.651.5579
F +1 214.200.0411

Areas of Practice

Education

  • J.D., University of Texas, 1976, cum laude; Associate Editor, Texas Law Review; Teaching Quizmaster
  • B.A., University of Texas, 1973, summa cum laude, Plan II (liberal arts honors program)

Bar Admissions

  • Texas

Nina Cortell is ranked by Chambers USA Guide as one of the top appellate lawyers in Texas (2011) and is widely known for her experience in handling large, complex appeals. For more than 35 years, Ms. Cortell has represented corporations, individuals, and public entities in appeals that have put her at the forefront of Texas appellate practice. She has frequently been asked to speak on appellate topics and to assist courts with issues related to the judicial process. Ms. Cortell serves on the prestigious Texas Supreme Court Advisory Committee, which is comprised of judges and attorneys across the state and advises the Court in connection with its rule-making authority. Also, at the requests of Chief Judges Barefoot Sanders and Joe Fish, Ms. Cortell respectively chaired a task force investigating ways to improve the efficiency of the federal courts and assisted with the appointment of magistrate judges.  

In addition to her work in the appellate courts, Ms. Cortell has worked with trial teams to achieve significant results prior to appeal. During the trial phase, she has helped teams with dispositive motions and jury charges, and has reduced verdicts by millions of dollars.

Some of Ms. Cortell's recent representations include:

  • After filing of opening appellate briefs, opponent agreed to settle commercial dispute for almost $200 million less than its judgment. i2 Technologies, Inc. v. Dillards, Cause No. 05-10-01645-CV (Tex. App. -Dallas 2011).
  • Persuaded the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals to dismiss the appeal of a $3.6 billion bankruptcy plan of reorganization, which was challenged by a competing bidder and the company's union. In the Matter of Asarco L.L.C., Cause No. 09-41259 (5th Cir. 2010).
  • Obtained remittitur in the district court prior to appeal, reducing punitive damages award by $77.6 million. IRCC, et al. v. Harold Simmons, et al., 192nd Judicial District Court, Dallas, Texas (2009).
  • Obtained mandamus review in the Texas Supreme Court on behalf of a large bank group in $26 billion dispute. In re Citigroup, Cause No. 08-0289 (Tex. 2008).
  • Reversed $8.5 million judgment adverse to client and obtained rendition of $2.5 million judgment in favor client. Blockbuster Inc. v. C-Span and Sunil Dharod, 276 S.W.3d 482 (Tex. Civ. App. – Dallas 2008, pet. granted and judgm't vacated pursuant to settlement).
  • Assisted trial team in reversing class certification order in Enron class litigation. Regents of the University of California v. Credit Suisse First Boston (USA), Inc., 482 F.3d 372 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 128 S.Ct. 1120 (2008).
  • Reversed eminent domain judgment based upon federal preemption. The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Corporation v. The City of Houston, Texas, 171 S.W.3d 240 (Tex. App. – Houston [14th Dist.] 2005).
  • Obtained ruling allowing constitutional challenge of Texas public school finance system. West Orange-Cove Consolidated I.S.D. v. Felipe Alanis, Commissioner of Education, 107 S.W.3d 558 (Tex. 2003).
  • Secured return of hospital and pharmacy and reversed $12 million judgment. In re Liljeberg, 304 F.3d 410 (5th Cir. 2002).

Selected Professional and Community Service Activities

  • Fellow, American Academy of Appellate Lawyers
  • President (2005-2007) and Master, Patrick E. Higginbotham Inn of Court
  • Member, Texas Supreme Court Advisory Committee
  • Member, American Law Institute
  • President (2008-2009), University of Texas School of Law Alumni Association
  • President-Elect, Board of Directors of the Texas Law Review Association
  • Co-Founder and Member of Executive Committee, Center for Women in Law at the University of Texas School of Law
  • Trustee, Center for American and International Law
  • Trustee, Dallas Bar Foundation
  • Advisory Board Member, Dallas Women Lawyers Association (2000-2009)
  • Chair, State Bar Task Force on Hiring, Retention and Promotion of Women and Minorities in Law Firms and Corporations (2006)
  • Course Director, State Bar of Texas Advanced Appellate Course (2003)
  • Chair, Dallas Bar Association Bench/Bar Conference (2003)

Honors

  • Best Lawyers' 2010 Dallas Appellate Lawyer of the Year
  • Recognized in Chambers USA Guide - America's Leading Lawyers for Business (Appellate, Band 1) (2008-2011)
  • Best Lawyers in America for Appellate Law; Bet-the-Company Litigation; Commercial Litigation, Woodward/White, Inc. (2006-2012)
  • Selected by Dallas Bar Association as "Outstanding Lawyer of the Year" (2009)
  • Top 10 "Texas Super Lawyers," with 2nd highest votes received (2010 and 2011); Top 100 "Texas Super Lawyers," Top 100 "Super Lawyers in the Dallas/Fort Worth Region,"and "Top 50 Female Texas Super Lawyers" (2003-2011)
  • One of the top appellate lawyers in Dallas, D Magazine (every year list published, 2003-2011)
  • University of Texas School of Law Distinguished Alumnus Award for Community Service (2012)
  • Higginbotham Inn of Court's 2012 selection to Honorary Serjeant's Inn, in recognition of significant contributions to the profession and community
  • State Bar of Texas Presidential Citation for leadership in furthering the Bar's diversity initiatives (2007)
  • Louise B. Raggio Award for significant contributions toward the advancement of women in the legal profession (1999)

Selected Representative Experience


i2 Technologies, Inc. v. Dillards, Cause No. 05-10-01645-CV (Tex. App. -Dallas 2011)
After filing of opening appellate briefs, opponent agreed to settle commercial dispute for almost $200 million less than its judgment.

Grimaldo v. Baylor Irving, No. CC-0900690-A (Co. Ct. at Law No. 1, Dallas County, Tex. Jan. 27, 2009); Julieta Garcia v. Baylor Medical Center at Irving, No. DC-10-02152-M (298th Dist. Ct., Dallas County, Tex. Feb. 25, 2010).
Obtained favorable settlements of two separate cases involving multi-million dollar medical malpractice claims against hospital system by invoking sovereign immunity conferred by new provisions of the Texas Health & Safety Code and by defending constitutional challenges to statute.

In the Matter of Asarco L.L.C., Cause No. 09-41259 (5th Cir. 2010)
Persuaded the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals to dismiss the appeal of a $3.6 billion bankruptcy plan of reorganization, which was challenged by a competing bidder and the company's union.

Amber Wilson v. Baylor Medical Center Irving, et al, No. 08-12603 (162nd Dist. Ct., Dallas County, Tex.)
Obtained dismissal of medical malpractice claims against Baylor Medical Center at Irving on the basis of immunity conferred by new Texas Health & Safety Code provisions. Secured dismissal of all claims against hospital on the basis of lack of actual notice and no waiver of immunity by use of tangible personal property under the Texas Tort Claims Act, and dismissal of hospital employees on the basis of the Act's “election of remedies” provision.

Duncan v. NTFN Inc. and Morningside Property Co., No. 05-07-00430-CV (Tex. App. - Dallas Aug. 26, 2008, no pet. h.)
Won a complete victory for its clients, NTFN Inc. and Morningside Property Company, in an appeal of a summary judgment involving a real estate lien against company property. The Dallas Court of Appeals affirmed the summary judgment in our clients' favor and held that they were entitled to the full amount of their attorneys' fees.

Max Duncan Family Investments, Ltd. v. NTFN Inc., 267 S.W.3d 447 (Tex. App.-Dallas 2008, pet. denied)
In a case involving a real estate lien against company property, successfully defended a summary judgment on appeal and obtained a full award of attorneys’ fees.

Zuffa, LLC v. HDNet MMA 2008 LLC, 262 S.W.3d 446 (Tex. App.-Dallas 2008, orig. proceeding)
Persuaded the Dallas Court of Appeals to grant mandamus relief directing the trial court to stay litigation pending the outcome of Nevada arbitration proceedings between The Ultimate Fighting Championship mixed martial arts fight promoter and fighter Randy Couture.

Thomas Michael Wilson v. Baylor Health Care System, et al, No. 07-01018-E (101st Dist. Ct., Dallas County, Tex.)
Obtained dismissal of medical malpractice claims against Baylor Health Care System and Baylor Medical Center at Irving on the basis of immunity conferred by new Texas Health & Safety Code provisions, and asserted “election of remedies” defenses under the Texas Tort Claims Act on behalf of hospital employees, leading to their dismissal.

In re Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., No. 08-0289 (Tex. May 13, 2008)
Obtained a favorable settlement after persuading the Texas Supreme Court to grant oral argument in this mandamus proceeding involving the application of a forum selection clause to a nonsignatory under the direct benefits estoppel doctrine.

Blockbuster Inc. v. C-Span Entertainment, Inc., 276 S.W.3d 482 (Tex. App. - Dallas 2008, pet. granted, judgm't vacated w.r.m.)
In a suit brought by a franchisee, obtained reversal of an adverse $8.5 million judgment and secured an award of $2.5 million for attorneys’ fees and costs.

Kent v. Baylor Medical Center Irving, No. 04-08723-D (95th Dist. Ct., Dallas County, Tex.)
Represented a health care client asserting Texas Tort Claims Act defenses and defended against constitutional challenges to statutes designating the client as a governmental unit.

Hollar v. Brackenridge Hospital, No. GN502643 (200th Dist. Ct., Travis County, Tex.)
As lead appellate counsel, led the trial team’s efforts that resulted in the pre-trial dismissal of medical malpractice claims against a health care provider on the basis of governmental immunity conferred by new Texas Health & Safety Code provisions, and successfully defended against a constitutional challenge to statutory immunity provisions.

Neeley v. West Orange-Cove Consolidated Independent School District, 176 S.W.3d 746 (Tex. 2005)
Persuaded the Texas Supreme Court to strike down the Texas public school finance system on constitutional grounds; this decision was the culmination of a four- and-a-half year effort, including a previous successful appeal to the Texas Supreme Court and a successful five-week bench trial.

United States ex rel. Williams v. Bell Helicopter Textron Inc., 417 F.3d 450 (5th Cir. 2005)
Obtained a judgment affirming the dismissal of qui tam action under the False Claims Act.

Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. City of Houston, 171 S.W.3d 240 (Tex. App. - Houston [14th Dist.] 2005, no pet.)
Obtained reversal of a judgment denying a railroad's right to condemn property for a proposed rail line, resulting in rendition of a judgment confirming the railroad's right to condemn under the doctrine of federal preemption.

In re C-Span Entertainment, Inc., 162 S.W.3d 422 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2005, orig. proceeding)
Upheld a contractual jury waiver provision in mandamus proceedings.

Tenet Healthcare Corp. v. Texas Health Choice, No. 3:02-CV-1940-N (N.D. Tex. 2003); No. 03-10545 (5th Cir. 2004)
Successfully represented a health care client in the Fifth Circuit in a case that involved a question of first impression: whether the Medicare Act and the Federal Employees Health Benefits Act preempt a state court lawsuit concerning insurance reimbursement contracts between private parties, warranting removal to federal court.

Texas First National Bank v. Wu, 347 F. Supp. 2d 389 (S.D. Tex. 2004)
Obtained remand from federal district court to state court in a case involving a dispute by bank officers over control of the bank.

Millichamp v. Baylor Univ. Med. Center, No. 01-01793-E (101st Dist. Ct., Dallas County, Tex.)
Persuaded the trial court to set aside a $7.5 million punitive damages award in a case that involved complex jury charge issues including the submission of settling co-defendants and complex judgment formation issues involving settlement credits.

Greenpeace, Inc. v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 133 S.W.3d 804 (Tex. App. —Dallas 2004, pet. denied)
Upheld a nationwide temporary injunction preventing illegal and tortious conduct by Greenpeace against ExxonMobil facilities following an unlawful entry by Greenpeace activists at ExxonMobil headquarters.

CIGNA Healthcare of Texas, Inc. v. Pybas, 127 S.W.3d 400 (Tex. App. - Dallas 2004, no pet.)
Successfully defended on appeal a $13 million jury verdict in a wrongful death case.

Kondos v. Lincoln Property Co., 110 S.W.3d 716 (Tex. App. - Dallas 2003, no pet.)
In a case of first impression under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, obtained reversal of an order certifying a class of more than 60,000 members who alleged “junk faxing” by a company that owns apartment complexes.

Anderson v. Siemens Corp., 335 F.3d 466 (5th Cir. 2003)
Obtained a reversal of a $7.5 million judgment in a products liability case.

Bolle, Inc. v. American Greetings Corp., 109 S.W.3d 827 (Tex. App. - Dallas 2003, pet. denied)
Successfully defended a judgment setting aside an agreement on the basis of mutual mistake, in a case challenging the application of a contractual release given in one case to unrelated litigation pending in another state.

West Orange-Cove Consolidated Independent School District v. Alanis, 107 S.W.3d 558 (Tex. 2003)
Obtained a ruling reinstating a constitutional challenge to Texas’ public school finance system, following the lower courts’ dismissal of the case on ripeness grounds.

Panda Energy Corp. v. Allstate Insurance Co., 91 S.W.3d 29 (Tex. App. - Dallas 2002, pet. dism’d by agr.)
In an opinion that created new law with respect to anti-suit injunctions, obtained reversal of an anti-suit injunction that prevented an energy company from enforcing a $450 million judgment it won in another Texas court.

In re Pepsico, Inc., 87 S.W.3d 787 (Tex. App. - Texarkana 2002, orig. proceeding)
Obtained a conditional writ of mandamus ordering a trial court to reinstate a motion to transfer venue.

In the Matter of Liljeberg Enterprises, Inc., 304 F.3d 410 (5th Cir. 2002)
Obtained reversal of a $12 million award in a contract dispute involving severability and cross-default issues implicating the power to assume an executory contract.

Exxon Corp. v. Breezevale Ltd., 82 S.W.3d 429 (Tex. App. - Dallas 2002, pet. denied)
Obtained reversal of a $34.3 million judgment based on a jury verdict against an oil company in a suit involving a claimed oral agreement that was held to be barred by the statute of frauds.

McCutchin v. Addison Texas Tumbleweed, Inc., No. 05-98-01918-CV, 2001 WL 910940 (Tex. App. - Dallas Aug. 13, 2001, pet. denied) (mem. op.)
Obtained reversal of an adverse $1.2 million judgment in a wrongful eviction case and obtained a $100,000 judgment in favor of our client.

Southwest-Tex Leasing Co. v. Denise, No. 11-99-00127-CV, 2000 WL 34235126 (Tex. App. - Eastland 2000, no pet.) (mem. op.)
Reversed a jury verdict on claims of negligence and gross negligence arising from an automobile accident.

Texas Farmers Insurance Co. v. Cameron, 24 S.W.3d 386 (Tex. App. - Dallas 2007, pet. denied)
Upheld on appeal a multi-million jury verdict based on claims of bad faith and insurance code violations.

Debt Restructure and Collections
Represented Southwest Savings Association, Bonnet Resources, Amresco, and Sunbelt Savings Association in connection with the collection of hundreds of loans including, real property foreclosures, personal property foreclosures, litigation, demands for payment, restructurings, and bankruptcies. These loans covered all industries and involved many novel factual and legal issues.

Panda Energy Corp. v. Heard Energy Corp., No. 05-96-01301-CV, 1998 WL 549032 (Tex. App. - Dallas Aug. 31, 1998, pet denied) (mem. op.)
Won reversal of a summary judgment disposing of a power plant developer’s claims against former affiliates for misappropriation of corporate opportunities.

National Medical Enterprises, Inc. v. Godbey, 924 S.W.2d 123 (Tex. 1996, orig. proceeding)
Obtained a writ of mandamus from the Texas Supreme Court disqualifying opposing counsel in a case against a hospital corporation and a former hospital administrator.

Federal Savings & Loan Insurance Corp. v. T.F. Stone-Liberty Land Associates, 787 S.W.2d 475 (Tex. App. -Dallas 1990, writ dism'd by agr.)
Won reversal of an $80 million judgment in a lawsuit against a savings institution and its wholly-owned service corporation for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, usury, punitive damages and attorneys' fees.

City of Dallas v. Continental Airlines, Inc., 735 S.W.2d 496 (Tex. App. - Dallas 1987, writ denied)
Obtained summary judgment entitling Continental Airlines to fly out of Dallas Love Field and successfully defended that judgment on appeal.

George Grubbs Enters. v. Bien, 900 S.W.2d 337 (Tex. 1995)
Obtained reversal of a $5.8 million judgment in a case involving an intentional infliction of emotional distress claim against an automobile dealer based on a faulty jury instruction in the exemplary damage question; the case made clear that exemplary damages cannot be awarded against one defendant according to the wealth of a separate entity based upon deficient corporate disregard instructions.

Doe v. Brookhaven Country Club, No. 04-10591-D (95th Dist. Ct., Dallas County, Tex.)
Argued a jury charge involving issues of negligence and punitive damages, resulting in a favorable take-nothing judgment.

Soliman v. American Airlines, Inc., No. 94 08428 C, (68th Dist. Ct., Dallas County, Tex.)
Persuaded the trial court to grant a $10 million remittitur from a $28 million verdict, after which the case settled.

Online Publications

06/04/2009 - Invisible Ink: What You Didn’t Sign (Binding Non-Signatories to Arbitration Clauses, Jury Waivers, and Forum Selection Clauses)
Increasingly, sophisticated parties are agreeing to mandatory arbitration provisions, jury waivers, or forum selection clauses in order to control any future litigation. This paper gives an overview of how the Texas Supreme Court has addressed issues that arise, and attempts to predict how it might resolve similar questions in the future.

07/20/2006 - Analysis of Texas Supreme Court's opinion in Neeley et al. v. West Orange-Cove et al., 176 S.W.3d 74

11/28/2005 - Analysis of Texas Supreme Court’s opinion in Neeley et al. v. West Orange-Cove et al.

06/23/2005 - The Charge: Top Five Things You Need to Know
State Bar of Texas Annual Meeting: Litigation Section (June 23, 2005)

04/01/2005 - Mark Twain's Guide for Young Lawyers (and Older Lawyers Seeking a Review)

09/10/2004 - Post-Verdict Landmines: A Survival Guide
This paper attempts to provide a guide for handling that intense period of time between verdict and the expiration of jurisdiction in the trial court, from the perspective of the losing defendant.

05/13/2003 - The Court's Charge
Dallas Bar Association Business Litigation Section (May 13, 2003)

01/11/2002 - Court's Charge - Minefield Approach
When Do You Draft? It is never too early to start drafting your charge. Knowledge of how your charge will look will assist with the pleading, discovery, and proof aspects of your case. Indeed, advance knowledge of your charge will ensure that you not prove up the wrong case! The first big bad mistake of charge practice is waiting too long to draft the charge. A draft should be prepared at the outset of the case and updated throughout the pretrial process. You should avoid the temptation of waiting until the eve before charge conference! By that point, it may well be too late.