﻿<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="rss.xsl.aspx?id=20"?>
<rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Intellectual Property Alerts</title>
    <link>http://www.haynesboone.com/</link>
    <description>Haynes and Boone alerts for the Intellectual Property Practice</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright />
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 15:46:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 15:46:31 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>Nuggets in the Ashes: A Few Guideposts Unearthed from CLS Bank v. Alice Corporation</title>
      <description>The Federal Circuit released the results of its en banc hearing of a case involving the issue of what is patent eligible subject matter under section 101 of the Patent Act.</description>
      <link>http://www.haynesboone.com/es/CLS-Bank-v-Alice-Corporation</link>
      <category>Publication</category>
      <guid>bf75abb9-e137-43ed-8541-d8bfe8b44bcb</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>California Man Convicted of Hacking into Former Employer’s Computer Network</title>
      <description>A jury in the Northern District of California has convicted David Nosal of violating the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (“CFAA”) by accessing his former employer’s computer network without authorization to obtain confidential information for use in a competing business.</description>
      <link>http://www.haynesboone.com/es/California-Man-Convicted-of-Hacking</link>
      <category>Publication</category>
      <guid>53131173-51d5-4899-ae7f-01e500a7c4b2</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>California Computer Hacking Case Highlights Important Circuit Split on the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act</title>
      <description>The computer hacking trial of David Nosal is under way in federal district court in California. The trial is being followed with interest in the business community because it is the latest development in a case that highlights an important split in the interpretation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (“CFAA”) that has far-reaching ramifications with respect to liability–and protection for companies’ proprietary information.</description>
      <link>http://www.haynesboone.com/es/California-Computer-Hacking-Case</link>
      <category>Publication</category>
      <guid>362a2e52-8a2c-4248-9b4d-a93cab5678d3</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Subject Matter Support in Design Continuation Applications: In re Owens Decision Provides New Guidance</title>
      <description>On March 26, 2013, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the U.S. Patent Office’s rejection of the claim of a design patent continuation application, bringing some degree of clarity to the practice of claiming a portion of a previously-claimed design while seeking priority to the filing date of the previously-claimed design.</description>
      <link>http://www.haynesboone.com/es/Federal-Circuit-in-re-Owens</link>
      <category>Publication</category>
      <guid>b4af68ce-58d1-42b3-ab85-e7df58ace31c</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cyber Attacks are the Number One Threat to National Security</title>
      <description>The U.S. Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, advised the Senate Intelligence Committee this week that cyber attacks are the number one threat to national security.</description>
      <link>http://www.haynesboone.com/es/Cyber-Attacks-Threat-National-Security</link>
      <category>Publication</category>
      <guid>497bcd34-bd72-43d4-bda6-4a978ef8afc5</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Public Companies Increasingly Disclosing Cybersecurity Risks</title>
      <description>An increasing number of public companies&amp;nbsp;- particularly banks and financial institutions&amp;nbsp;- are disclosing cybersecurity incidents in their filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.</description>
      <link>http://www.haynesboone.com/es/Public-Company-Disclosure-Cybersecurity</link>
      <category>Publication</category>
      <guid>9ad0145c-2311-455c-9324-1a12440f92c2</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>President Obama Signs Cybersecurity Executive Order</title>
      <description>President Obama recently signed an executive order focused on improving the security of the nation’s infrastructure from cyber attack.</description>
      <link>http://www.haynesboone.com/es/Cybersecurity-Executive-Order</link>
      <category>Publication</category>
      <guid>f087e0ce-44ad-4e70-806f-05955f63d8bd</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>U.S. Supreme Court Says “Enough, Already” - Nike’s Broad Covenant Not to Sue Mooted Its Competitor’s Cancellation Counterclaim</title>
      <description>Sometimes, litigants are forced to reevaluate their strategy mid-course. Occasionally, a plaintiff in a pending trademark infringement action faces a cancellation counterclaim that poses a real threat to the plaintiff’s trademark.</description>
      <link>http://www.haynesboone.com/es/Already-v-Nike-Covenant-Not-to-Sue</link>
      <category>Publication</category>
      <guid>506f4fd0-ff64-4a2e-ae1c-3af0b3542ab6</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>One Patent (and Court) to Rule Them All: An Unexpected European Decision?</title>
      <description>Coming as a surprise to some, the European Parliament approved rules creating a Unified Patent Court and a Unitary Patent on December 11, 2012, after lengthy consideration.</description>
      <link>http://www.haynesboone.com/es/One-Patent-to-Rule</link>
      <category>Publication</category>
      <guid>8bb4401e-908e-42e9-ae81-198cfc71c638</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Step Right Up and Adjust Your Patent Term: Court Finds Improper PTO Calculations</title>
      <description>The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) has been improperly calculating patent term adjustment (“PTA”) for some patents, specifically, in cases where prosecution of the underlying application involved the filing of a Request for Continued Examination (“RCE”) more than three years after the&amp;nbsp;application filing.</description>
      <link>http://www.haynesboone.com/es/newsroom/pubdetail.aspx?pub=3935</link>
      <category>Publication</category>
      <guid>dd151210-2999-4805-b3e5-439b100cd9ce</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The IP Beacon, October 2012</title>
      <description>A Haynes and Boone Newsletter highlighting current issues in Intellectual Property Law.</description>
      <link>http://www.haynesboone.com/es/The-IP-Beacon-October-2012</link>
      <category>Publication</category>
      <guid>9eb94094-43fb-405f-9de5-5051c3690339</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CLS Bank and Bancorp: Back to Back Federal Circuit Decisions Offer Different Conclusions on Patentability</title>
      <description>The issue of whether particular inventions include “patent eligible” subject matter under § 101 of the patent statute has become highly controversial in recent years, raising questions with high economic stakes and profound legal and philosophical implications. Twice the Supreme Court has entered the fray, first in Bilski v. Kappos in 2010, and earlier this year in Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.</description>
      <link>http://www.haynesboone.com/es/Federal-Court-Decisions-Patentability</link>
      <category>Publication</category>
      <guid>6d30e42d-7f26-4e68-881a-02f1e2ad5597</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Big Reveal: ICANN Announces New gTLDs and Their Applicants</title>
      <description>After several delays, ICANN has published the list of generic top level domain (“gTLD” or “string”) applicants and the gTLDs they have applied for.</description>
      <link>http://www.haynesboone.com/es/newsroom/pubdetail.aspx?pub=3828</link>
      <category>Publication</category>
      <guid>cd0d8384-46ed-4c2f-bcd1-05c5030622b2</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>