﻿<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="rss.xsl.aspx?id=24"?>
<rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Litigation/Trial Practice Alerts</title>
    <link>http://www.haynesboone.com/</link>
    <description>Haynes and Boone alerts for the Litigation/Trial Practice</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright />
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 18:38:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 18:38:46 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>OIG Releases Updated Self-Disclosure Protocol</title>
      <description>On April 17, 2013, the Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (OIG) released an Updated Provider Self-Disclosure Protocol (SDP), which replaces the original SDP published in 1998.</description>
      <link>http://www.haynesboone.com/es/OIG-Releases-Updated-Self-Disclosure-Protocol</link>
      <category>Publication</category>
      <guid>ea8e6ce0-f48a-49a1-8b77-b684e27c7a9c</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New Texas State Court Rules Become Effective March 1, 2013</title>
      <description>For the first time, Texas rules permit a motion to dismiss. On February 12, the Texas Supreme Court released the final version of Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 91a, which (1)&amp;nbsp;establishes procedures for dismissal of civil claims, and (2)&amp;nbsp;provides for the mandatory award of attorneys’ fees to the prevailing party.</description>
      <link>http://www.haynesboone.com/es/New-Texas-State-Court-Rules</link>
      <category>Publication</category>
      <guid>b83ae711-33bb-4828-9417-2eca1d38a76b</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Texas Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Joint Defense and Common Interest Privileges Under Texas Evidentiary Rules</title>
      <description>On Friday, June 29, 2012, the Texas Supreme Court denied a petition for mandamus relief in In re XL Specialty Insurance Company and Cambridge Integrated Services, Group, Inc., No. 10-0960 (Tex. June 29, 2012), clarifying the scope of the joint defense and common interest privilege doctrines under Texas law.</description>
      <link>http://www.haynesboone.com/es/Texas-Supreme-Court-Clarifies</link>
      <category>Publication</category>
      <guid>055eca3c-d74c-423d-9dbc-8d166d8b084e</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fifth Circuit: Class Arbitration Proceedings Available Only with the Parties’ Consent</title>
      <description>On May 18, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held in Reed v. Florida Metropolitan University, Inc. that class actions are available in arbitration proceedings only if there is a contractual basis for finding that the parties agreed to class arbitration.</description>
      <link>http://www.haynesboone.com/es/newsroom/pubdetail.aspx?pub=3812</link>
      <category>Publication</category>
      <guid>f1df5c0c-b4cd-494b-827c-52755af9a49b</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>