Scott Ewing


Education and Clerkships

J.D., Texas Wesleyan University School of Law, 2008, summa cum laude, Notes and Comments Editor, Texas Wesleyan Law Review

B.A., University of Texas at Austin, 1995

Bar Admissions

Texas, 2008

Court Admissions

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas


Scott Ewing has served as a key advisor and counsel to numerous corporations and executives in civil and criminal investigations, antitrust matters, and class action litigation.  Scott has successfully defended some of the world’s most recognized businesses in complex matters involving civil and criminal components and has tried cases in state and federal court, as well as arbitration hearings and SEC administrative proceedings.  Scott frequently represents companies, directors, and officers in DOJ, SEC, and internal investigations. 

Apart from his civil and criminal litigation work, Scott also regularly counsels clients on a wide variety of antitrust issues, including resale price maintenance (“RPM”); advertised pricing; minimum advertised price (“MAP”) policies; internet minimum advertised price (“IMAP”) policies; Colgate policies; and customer and territorial restraints.  Scott’s work spans a broad variety of industries, including consumer products, electronics, lighting solutions, and restaurant franchises.  Clients frequently turn to Scott to formulate solutions to complex pricing issues, and he is routinely asked to speak on navigating antitrust concerns in the areas of product pricing and distribution.

While not working on behalf of his clients, Scott serves on the Memorial and History Committee of the Dallas Bar Association and proudly works the North Texas chapter of the March of Dimes.

Scott was named a Texas Super Lawyers Rising Star in 2013-2014.

Publications and Speeches

  • "Navigating Antitrust Concerns," ALA Annual Conference Presentation, September 15, 2014. 
  • "Chancery's Guidance on How MFW Operates At Pleading Stage," co-author, Law360, September 10, 2014. 
  • “Navigating the Minefield of Product Pricing and Distribution,” Dallas Bar Association Antitrust & Trade Regulation Section, March 18, 2014. 
  • “Ethical Issues in Internal Investigations,” presented with Kathy Beasley at the Ethical Principles for Corporate Counsel seminar, October 10, 2013. 
  • “Supreme Court Securities Litigation Update,” presented with Thad Behrens, Dallas Bar Association Securities Section, June 24, 2013. 
  • "Avoiding Legal Pitfalls Related to Antitrust Issues and the Internet," presented with Bill Morrison at the American Lighting Association Annual Conference, September 9-11, 2012.


Super Lawyers

Texas Rising Stars 2014

Thirty-two Haynes and Boone lawyers have been selected for inclusion in the 2014 edition of the Texas Super Lawyers Rising Stars directory. Compiled through peer nominations and research, the Rising Star distinction is given to only two percent of young attorneys in Texas.

Bar and Court Admissions

  • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas 
  • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

  • Bar Admissions: Texas, 2008

Selected Client Representations

  • DOJ Price Fixing Investigations – Representation of corporations and corporate executives in civil and criminal international cartel litigation in a variety of industries.
  • Conducting various internal investigations of corporate conduct for report to special committees of the Boards of Directors of public companies.
  • Antitrust counseling – advising public and private companies.
  • Successful defense of corporate executives in criminal international cartel litigation.
  • Represented AT&T on antitrust matters related to proposed acquisition of T-Mobile USA, including pre-merger planning.
  • Defeated class certification for the National Football League in lawsuit alleging claims of breach of contract and fraud against the NFL and the Dallas Cowboys for allegedly not providing prescribed seats to ticketholders at the Super Bowl XLV game.
  • Represented Fortune 200 defense company in a dispute involving claims of monopolization, group boycott, and tying.
  • Represented board of directors in connection with shareholder class action in Nevada alleging breaches of fiduciary duty in connection with board approval of merger.
  • Representing a motor-vehicle manufacturer in a complex commercial dispute.
  • Participating in internal investigation of corporate conduct for report to the Board of Directors of a Fortune 100 company.
  • Assisting in the defense of the former CEO of an international technology company in an SEC enforcement action for options backdating.

Email Disclaimer