Marco Pulido

Practices

Education and Clerkships

J.D., University of California Irvine School of Law, 2015, cum laude; Executive Board, Notes Chair, and Lead Article Editor, UC Irvine Law Review

B.A., California State University, Fullerton, 2012, summa cum laude

  • Law Clerk to the Honorable Bruce J. McGiverin, U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico, 2015-2017
  • Legal Extern to the Honorable Richard M. Aronson, California Court of Appeal, 2015

Admissions

California

Court Admissions

U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, 2017

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Profile

After serving two years as a federal district court law clerk, Marco joined the Litigation Practice Group in the Orange County office of Haynes and Boone, where he focuses on appellate matters.

In law school, Marco served as an extern to an Orange County appellate justice and as a lead article editor and one of the five members of the executive board of the UC Irvine Law Review. In 2014, he was awarded both the California State Bar’s Wiley W. Manuel Certificate for Pro Bono Legal Services and the Orange County Hispanic Bar Association’s Wally Davis Memorial Scholarship.

Marco participated in UC Irvine Law’s Ninth Circuit Appellate Litigation Clinic, where he and a fellow law student participated in a pro bono case in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, working under the supervision of a Haynes and Boone appellate partner. The Ninth Circuit panel issued a published decision, including a vigorous dissent, which paved the way for en banc rehearing that resulted in an en banc reversal of Ninth Circuit asylum precedent.

Daily Journal

Daily Journal Spotlights Haynes and Boone California Court Wins

The Daily Journal in California has recognized three court wins handled by Haynes and Boone lawyers among the state’s top defense wins and top five appellate reversals of 2017.

Appellate

M.C. Sungaila and Marco Pulido

Haynes and Boone Files ACC Amicus Brief on In-House Counsel Privilege

In an amicus brief for the Association of Corporate Counsel in a patent infringement case, lawyers from Haynes and Boone argued that in-house counsel should receive the same confidentiality protections as outside counsel for their attorney-client communications.

Email Disclaimer