Federal Circuit Appeals From the PTAB: A New Game or Just the Same Old Practice?

03/22/2013

The America Invents Act (“AIA”) revamped the former Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (“BPAI”) into the new Patent and Trademark Appeal Board (“PTAB”).1 Since the AIA’s effective date, an average of one petition per day has been filed with the PTAB under the new inter partes review and covered business method post-grant review procedures.2 The PTAB has started granting these petitions and instituting trials, and given the expected pace of the proceedings, it is likely that some will be appealable to the Federal Circuit within the next twelve months.3

Here, we address the new game of PTAB appellate practice by examining strategies and issues related to PTAB proceedings, parallel proceedings occurring among the different patent dispute venues, and the Federal Circuit. For PTAB proceedings, we will examine building a proper record in the PTAB, appealing PTAB discovery decisions, and the expected appellate standards of review for PTAB decisions. With respect to parallel proceedings among the district court, Federal Circuit, and PTAB, we will discuss the effect of divergent decisions, obtaining a stay of district court litigation, and the issue of estoppel. Lastly, for Federal Circuit appeals, we will look at the requirements for a notice of appeal from the PTAB, the anticipated timing with respect to Federal Circuit rulings, and obtaining a stay of Federal Circuit review.

To read the full white paper, click on the PDF linked below.

PDF - Federal Circuit Appeals from the PTAB: a New Game or Just the Same Old Practice.pdf

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact one of the attorneys listed below.

David L. McCombs
214.651.5533
david.mccombs@haynesboone.com

Debbie J. McComas
214.651.5375
debbie.mccomas@haynesboone.com

 

Andrew S. Ehmke
214.651.5116
andy.ehmke@haynesboone.com

Stephanie N. Sivinski
214.651.5078
stephanie.sivinski@haynesboone.com 

___________________
*©2013 David L. McCombs, Debra J. McComas, Andrew S. Ehmke, and Stephanie N. Sivinski, Haynes and Boone, LLP. All Rights Reserved. This paper presents information about recent legal precedents and is intended to spur thoughtful consideration of their impact on the practice of law. This paper does not necessarily reflect the views of the authors, Haynes and Boone, or any former or present clients.
1 See 35 U.S.C. § 6. While some things have changed considerably under the AIA, other things have not. Where a rule or assertion applies equally to both the former BPAI and the new PTAB, this paper refers to them interchangeably as the “Board.”
2 See AIA, Pub. L. No. 112-29, § 35 (making amendments effective one year after statute’s enactment date, which was September 16, 2011).
3 See, e.g. SAP Am., Inc., Case CBM2012-00001 (MPT) (Jan. 9, 2013); Garmin Int’l, Inc., Case IPR2012-00001 (JL) (Jan. 9, 2013).

Email Disclaimer