﻿<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="rss.xsl.aspx?id=16"?>
<rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Finance Alerts</title>
    <link>http://www.haynesboone.com/</link>
    <description>Haynes and Boone alerts for the Finance Practice</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright />
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 03:12:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 03:12:57 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>The Impact of Dodd-Frank on Public Companies</title>
      <description>Haynes and Boone has prepared a summary of significant provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act that may have consequences for public companies and their officers and directors, as well as related entities, along with commentary on those provisions.</description>
      <link>http://www.haynesboone.com/The_Impact_of_Dodd-Frank</link>
      <category>Publication</category>
      <guid>50379b03-bf7f-45da-9ac5-ce4ca2b64448</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NY Court of Appeals Rules Lender Reliance on Borrower Financial Representations Without Independent Investigation is not Unreasonable</title>
      <description>An almost universal feature of commercial loan agreements is the inclusion of representations and warranties regarding the financial statements and condition of the borrower. A recent case examined whether under New York law, sophisticated lenders can reasonably rely upon such representations in asserting claims of fraud instead of being required to make an independent investigation into the books and records of the Borrower.</description>
      <link>http://www.haynesboone.com/NY_Court_of_Appeals</link>
      <category>Publication</category>
      <guid>3be61593-f79f-4b2c-aa87-33f8d050ad6e</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Weathering the Storm: The FDIC’s Authority to Repudiate Contracts</title>
      <description>The current economic climate has led to a dramatic increase in bank failures over the past few years. In 2009 alone, 140 banks failed, compared to 26 bank failures in 2008 and only 3 bank failures in 2007. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) recently announced that it has 702 banks on its “Problem List” as of December 31, 2009, up 27 percent from 552 banks on September 30, 2009. This acute trend has heightened the awareness and interest in the role of the FDIC as receiver of a failed bank.</description>
      <link>http://www.haynesboone.com/Weathering_FDIC</link>
      <category>Publication</category>
      <guid>4e63198c-33ca-44d0-b0a4-b256d7b0a45d</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>