﻿<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="rss.xsl.aspx?id=3"?>
<rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Labor and Employment Alerts</title>
    <link>http://www.haynesboone.com/</link>
    <description>Haynes and Boone alerts for the Labor and Employment Practice</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright />
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 08:17:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 08:17:40 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>OSHA is “Back in the Enforcement Business.” Are You Prepared?</title>
      <description>In 2010, current OSHA enforcement statistics confirm this promise and reveal unprecedented levels of enforcement.&amp;nbsp;The agency is also paving the way to bolster its capabilities through new proposed regulations.</description>
      <link>http://www.haynesboone.com/OSHA_Enforcement_Business</link>
      <category>Publication</category>
      <guid>0db83768-9633-4e64-8a5b-bc944065de71</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Litigating Arbitration Agreements: Recent United States Supreme Court Decisions Provide Guidance to Employers Looking to Avoid Court</title>
      <description>Despite entering into arbitration agreements with their employees, employers all too often find themselves in court adverse to the very employees who have signed an arbitration agreement. The U.S. Supreme Court recently issued three arbitration decisions that have important implications for employers seeking to avoid the inside of a courtroom.</description>
      <link>http://www.haynesboone.com/Litigating_Arbitration_Agreements</link>
      <category>Publication</category>
      <guid>d7442fdc-7f79-4ded-bfa9-e533c53c8f20</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Employer Searches and Underscores Importance of Electronic Communications Policies</title>
      <description>The United States Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision that provides guidance on steps employers can take to reduce an employee’s privacy expectations and emphasizes the importance of having a clear, well-defined privacy policy.</description>
      <link>http://www.haynesboone.com/US_Supreme_Court_Upholds_Employer_Searches</link>
      <category>Publication</category>
      <guid>f0099657-eed2-4e2a-b016-0050fbefa321</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Federal Government Implements Pro-Union Notice Requirement for Government Contractors</title>
      <description>Government contractors and subcontractors now have a new, unsavory obligation. On January 30, 2009, President Obama signed Executive Order 13496 – which requires government contractors and subcontractors to post a notice informing employees of their right to engage in concerted, collective activity.</description>
      <link>http://www.haynesboone.com/Federal_Government_Implements_Pro-Union_Notice_Requirement</link>
      <category>Publication</category>
      <guid>8c0faec6-0961-494a-9c2e-57c1ff72361e</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Plan, Prevent, Protect or Pay?  What Employers Should Expect From OSHA Under Its New Enforcement Strategies and Semiannual Regulatory Agenda</title>
      <description>Rolling out OSHA’s semiannual regulatory agenda on April 26, 2010, Secretary of Labor Hilda Solis unveiled several action items being marketed as the “Plan, Prevent, and Protect” enforcement strategy.</description>
      <link>http://www.haynesboone.com/What_Employers_Should_Expect_From_OSHA</link>
      <category>Publication</category>
      <guid>ea0fbf1f-a4db-4a10-a0c1-194573231946</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Employers Beware: How the Recent Health Care Reform Legislation Affects Employers</title>
      <description>On March 21, 2010, the House of Representatives passed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“PPACA”), which President Obama signed into law on March 23, 2010. The health care reform law will make far-reaching changes to the United States health care system over the next several years.&amp;nbsp;</description>
      <link>http://www.haynesboone.com/How_the_Recent_Health_Care_Reform_Affects_Employers</link>
      <category>Publication</category>
      <guid>eda10802-3949-4f0b-a67e-1029a9325191</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Time for Recess: Becker, Pearce Appointed to NLRB</title>
      <description>The National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) is finally moving towards its full complement of five members. On March 27, 2010, President Barack Obama made two recess appointments (a procedure not requiring legislative approval), increasing the NLRB’s membership from the two that have been serving the past couple of years to four members. The appointments still leave the NLRB one member short; however, three members constitute a quorum that can unquestionably decide cases before the Board.</description>
      <link>http://www.haynesboone.com/Becker_Pearce_Appointed_to_NLRB</link>
      <category>Publication</category>
      <guid>9daf4e19-ba44-4564-874d-02525daf77e4</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OSHA’s Enforcement Crackdown on Employer Recordkeeping</title>
      <description>As part of OSHA’s new emphasis on recordkeeping, employers should expect increased inspections and heightened enforcement of recordkeeping regulations.</description>
      <link>http://www.haynesboone.com/osha_crackdown_on_employer_recordkeeping</link>
      <category>Publication</category>
      <guid>f59e5334-aba2-486c-ad15-10511f983d66</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Can We Have That in Writing? Clear Reservation-of-Rights Saves Company from ERISA Class Action Over Change in Retiree Benefits</title>
      <description>Can an employer modify or terminate the medical benefits of retired employees? The answer depends on the language in the employer’s medical benefit plan. A recent federal court ruling highlights the importance of medical benefit plans unambiguously reserving the right to modify or terminate plan benefits. Without this language, an employer makes itself vulnerable to “he said/she said” disputes in which retirees claim that their former managers promised the retirees that their medical benefits would remain unchanged through retirement.</description>
      <link>http://www.haynesboone.com/Clear_Reservation_of_Rights_Saves_Company</link>
      <category>Publication</category>
      <guid>38c29a30-67bf-4696-a026-7c39e97ddef5</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Recent Case Dismissal Challenges "Geographic Presumption"</title>
      <description>A recent decision from the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission provides employers who must log workplace injuries and report workplace fatalities some latitude as to when an injury or fatality is “work-related.”&amp;nbsp;</description>
      <link>http://www.haynesboone.com/Recent_Case_Dismissal_Challenges_Geographic_Presumption</link>
      <category>Publication</category>
      <guid>47bcceae-fe53-40df-829d-4f837d371dfa</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>