• Transportation Ground-Breaking Alliance
    A Ground-Breaking Relationship with IATA for Legal Services across The Americas An alliance comprised of Haynes and Boone, LLP (United States), McMillan LLP (Canada), and Guanes, Heisecke & Piera (Paraguay) has secured a three-year joint retainer to act as the primary legal services provider for the International Air Transport Association (IATA) across all of the Americas and Caribbean.
  • Murray_Suzanne_300x169 Growth
    Environmental Lawyer Suzanne Murray Joins Haynes and Boone, Bolstering Environmental Practice

    Haynes and Boone, LLP is proud to announce that Suzanne Murray, formerly regional counsel of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 6, has joined the firm as a partner in the Dallas office.

  • MexicoEnergyReform Mexico's Energy Reform
    Haynes and Boone Lawyers Lead Key Panel Discussions

    Seven Haynes and Boone, LLP lawyers from three different offices recently took major roles in what has become an iconic forum for discussing energy reforms in Mexico. The Haynes and Boone, LLP Americas Colloquium and the Mexico Center and Center of Energy Studies at Rice University's Baker Institute sponsored the event, Mexico's Energy Reform: Let the Bidding Begin, which attracted nearly 200 energy industry executives and other private sector stakeholders.

  • Litigation Highlights Newsletter
    Litigation Highlights Newsletter

    Read about the recent trial victories of the Haynes and Boone, LLP Litigation department.

  • 2015 Euromoney Americas Women in Business Law Awards Honors
    Three Haynes and Boone Women Shortlisted for 2015 Euromoney Americas Women in Business Law Awards

    Haynes and Boone, LLP proudly announces nine nominations for the annual Americas Women in Business Law Awards, presented by Euromoney Legal Media Group. Haynes and Boone is nominated as the best overall firm in a region and for initiatives in five firm-wide categories. Additionally, three firm lawyers are shortlisted for individual awards that recognize excellence in specific practice areas.

  • Diversity Report 2015 Accomplishments
    Diversity Highlights

    The Attorney Diversity and Inclusion Committee develops initiatives that open doors and create windows of opportunity, with the goal of advancing the hiring, retention and promotion of diverse lawyers in our firm.

  • Buddy Clark Oil and Gas
    Buddy Clark in the Wall Street Journal: Noble’s Rosetta Deal Is OPEC’s Problem OPEC has apparently all but given up on oil prices getting back to triple digits and staying there over the next decade, in part because of the U.S. shale boom. Does Noble Energy’s $2.1 billion acquisition of Rosetta Resources offer the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries a glimmer of hope?...
  • Privacy Data Cybersecurity
    Haynes and Boone Lawyers Discuss Risks for Securities Industry Haynes and Boone's Emily Westridge Black and Christopher Quinlan discuss increasing regulatory scrutiny in the United States in light of the growing prevalence of cyber threats to businesses in Practical Compliance & Risk Management for the Securities Industry.
  • Thad Behrens Touchdown
    Haynes and Boone Garners National Attention for "A Series of Touchdowns" Scored on Behalf of the NFL in Super Bowl Seating Trial

    The verdict in the federal jury trial arising from the issues with the installation of temporary seating at Super Bowl XLV continues to garner national attention.  As quoted in the New York Times, Haynes and Boone partner and lead trial attorney Thad Behrens noted that “the NFL has always accepted responsibility for the problems that were experienced by some of its fans at Super Bowl XLV and has attempted from the beginning to compensate them for their genuinely received losses and inconvenience."  But on the most disputed issue in the trial—whether the League fraudulently induced two of the plaintiffs into purchasing seats with obstructed views for the game—the NFL prevailed decisively.  NBC Sports hailed the verdict as “a big win for the league.”  The Texas Lawbook called the verdict in the case the latest in “a series of touchdowns for the NFL’s lawyers, who all practice at Haynes and Boone.”  
    When the case was filed in February 2011, the plaintiffs designed it as a multi-million dollar class action on behalf of potentially hundreds of Super Bowl XLV ticketholders.   The Haynes and Boone trial team began dismantling the opposition back in July 2012 when the Court dismissed nearly all of the tort claims in the case.  That victory was followed by another in 2013, when the team secured the denial of class certification.  
    That led to Haynes and Boone’s successful defense of the League in the jury trial of the remaining eight Plaintiffs in the case. The Plaintiffs were seeking approximately $705,000 in actual and punitive damages. The Court granted a directed verdict in favor of the NFL on Plaintiffs’ punitive damages claims, and the jury ultimately awarded the Plaintiffs a total of only $75,850 – about $630,000 less than they were claiming. Of the victory, Thad Behrens said, “It has been a privilege and honor to represent the NFL in this case, and I couldn’t be more proud of the extraordinary team of Haynes and Boone lawyers and professionals who brought about this result for our client.”

    The jury verdict in this case comes less than two months after Haynes and Boone obtained the dismissal of all claims brought against the NFL in connection with a class action brought in New Jersey arising from claims that the NFL’s distribution of tickets to Super Bowl XLVIII violated New Jersey’s Consumer Fraud Act.

    Links to coverage - 

    Texas Lawbook (subscription required)

    NBC Sports

    New York Times (subscription required)


  • Recent Alerts

  • Jesse Gelsomini Employee Benefits
    Jesse Gelsomini Comments in Institutional Investor: Supreme Court Opens Up 401(k) Sponsors to New Lawsuits

    The U.S. Supreme Court just opened the door for a flood of new lawsuits against 401(k) plan sponsors. Three months after hearing arguments in Tibble v. Edison International, a lawsuit focused on whether plan fiduciaries have a duty to continuously monitor their investments under ERISA, the nine justices unanimously agreed that they do. What the Supreme Court failed to comment on — and what legal experts hope will be sorted out in forthcoming case law — is just what that duty should look like...

Email Disclaimer