Angela Oliver
Biography
Angela Oliver represents clients in appeals involving patents, intellectual property, technology, and administrative law, with a focus on matters before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
She has argued twenty cases before the Federal Circuit and has briefed dozens more. Her appellate work includes matters arising from federal district court litigation, Patent Trial and Appeal Board proceedings, patent prosecution appeals, and various decisions from federal courts and agencies. She also prepares appellate briefs in federal courts of appeals across the United States and has assisted with merits briefing in five cases before the U.S. Supreme Court, as well as certiorari-stage briefing.
Angela works with trial teams during litigation to address issues that may shape an appeal, including identifying and preserving appellate issues, assisting with dispositive motions, developing jury instructions, and preparing critical motions. She also assists clients by providing strategic guidance in inter partes review and post-grant review proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Her work has involved a range of technologies, including computer hardware and software, wireless communications, computer networks, High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC), medical devices, surgical tools, oil and gas drilling technology, and business methods. Earlier in her career, she prosecuted patent applications in multiple technical fields.
Angela previously served as a law clerk to then-Chief Judge Sharon Prost of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and to Judge Rodney Gilstrap of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.
-
- On behalf of a major technology company, successfully argued to the Federal Circuit for reversal of a PTAB decision, resulting in a decision invalidating a key patent claim based on principles of issue preclusion.
- Persuaded U.S. Supreme Court to deny review of petition for certiorari addressing requirements to establish constitutional standing after TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez.
- On behalf of another major technology company, successfully obtained vacatur and remand of an unfavorable PTAB decision in an inter partes review involving cybersecurity technology.
- Successfully briefed and argued a design patent appeal to the Federal Circuit that resolved an open question of design patent law and resulted in reversal of the USPTO’s rejection of a client’s design patent application.
- Assisted with merits briefing that persuaded U.S. Supreme Court to hold that inconsistencies across districts regarding fees for U.S. Trustees violated the uniformity requirement of the Constitution’s Bankruptcy Clause.
- Successfully represented global electronic components manufacturer before Federal Circuit in arguing for affirmance of PTAB decision in an inter partes review that invalidated patent claims involving mechanical sensors to detect rotational movement (e.g., for use in the automotive industry).
- On behalf of a food processing company, obtained favorable decision from Federal Circuit in an appeal from a U.S. District Court holding patent claims invalid as indefinite.
- Obtained affirmance by the Federal Circuit of a PTAB decision in an inter partes review on behalf of a medical device company, where the appeal centered on a dispute regarding priority dates.
- Obtained affirmance by the Federal Circuit of multiple PTAB decisions invalidating patents involve High Efficiency Video Coding technology.
-
- Giles S. Rich American Inn of Court
- Inn Counselor, 2025-2027
- Inn Administrator, 2024-2025
- Programming Committee, 2023-2024
- Pupilage Group Leader, 2022-2023
- Federal Circuit Bar Association
- PTAB/TTAB Committee, Vice Chair
- Patent Trial and Appeal Board Bar Association
- Trials Committee, Co-Chair, 2026-2027
- Giles S. Rich American Inn of Court
-
- Ranked #4 in overall performance for attorneys practicing at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Patexia’s CAFC Intelligence Report, 2025.
- Ranked in top 10 most active attorneys practicing before the Federal Circuit in Patexia’s CAFC Intelligence Report, 2025.
- Included in The Best Lawyers in America: Ones to Watch, Woodward/White, Inc., 2022–2027.
- Recognized as a Rising Star in Washington, DC, by Managing Intellectual Property, Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC, 2026.
-
- “CAFC Review of the PTAB: Mandamus, Recent Rulings, Emerging Trends,” IPWatchdog PTAB Masters, Jan. 2026
- “Haynes Boone Power Team Keeps Winning At Fed. Circ.,” featured, Law360, July 29, 2025
- “The Current Administration: IP Rights and Policy,” co-presenter, Chicago Bar Association, Oct. 2025 (remarks focused on impact of Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo after one year)
- Panel Discussion of Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, co-presenter, Barbara M.G. Lynn Inn of Court Meeting, Feb. 2025
- Federal Circuit Bar Association’s Patent Law Year in Review, co-presenter, February 2025
- “After the PTAB: Winning at the Federal Circuit,” co-presenter, IPWatchdog PTAB Masters 2025, Feb. 2025
- “2024 Federal Circuit Year in Review,” CAIL Institute for Law and Technology: 62nd Annual Conference on IP Law, Nov. 2024
- “Chevron Deference,” co-presenter, Federal Circuit Bar Association, July 2024
- Federal Circuit Bar Association’s Patent Law Year in Review, co-presenter, January 2023
- “From the PTAB to the Federal Circuit,” speaker, University of Texas Law, 27th Annual Advanced Patent Law Institute, October 2022
- “Options for Avoiding Non-Party Estoppel Based on Prior RPI Determinations,” presenter, University of Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal Symposium, March 4, 2022
- “Strategies for Addressing Fintiv Challenges Before the PTAB,” speaker, Virtual Patent Gateway webinar, February 23, 2022
- Federal Circuit Bar Association’s Patent Law Year in Review, co-presenter, February 2022
- “Data Points from Federal Circuit Administrative Procedure Act Decisions,” co-author, 2021 Appellate Year in Review, PTAB Bar Association, January 2022
- “Design Patents – Latest from Federal Circuit on Claim Scope and its Effects,” co-speaker, DBA Intellectual Property Section CLE, December 2, 2021
- “Drawing the Line: Appealability of Issues in PTAB Institution Decisions,” co-author, IP & Technology Law Journal, Vol. 33 No. 5, May 2021
- “Chevron Deference and the USPTO’s Determination of Applicant Delay in the Calculation of Patent Term Adjustment,” Author, IP Beacon: Patent Law Review, October 14, 2019
-
Education
- J.D., Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law, Order of the Coif
- B.S.I., Bioinformatics, Minor in Chemistry, Baylor University
Clerkships
Law Clerk to the Honorable Sharon Prost, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Law Clerk to the Honorable Rodney Gilstrap, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Admissions
- District of Columbia
- Texas
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Court Admissions
- United States Supreme Court
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
- U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
- U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas
- U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas
- U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas
-
How do you work with district court trial teams?
I work as appellate counsel alongside trial teams in district court litigation to identify and preserve appellate issues, develop jury instructions, and address key legal questions before, during, and after trial. I work both with trial teams from Haynes Boone and with trial teams from other firms.
What industries do you work with?
I primarily represent technology-driven companies of all sizes, including software, telecommunications, social media, medical device, and energy companies.
What topics do you write and speak about?
I write and speak regularly on subjects related to intellectual property law and administrative law, with a recent focus on federal agency rulemaking and compliance with the Administrative Procedure Act, judicial review of administrative agency actions (including review of USPTO actions), and the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo regarding deference to federal administrative agencies.
Haynes Boone Earns Top Rankings in Managing IP's 2026 IP STARS, 15 Attorneys Recognized
August 03, 2026Haynes Boone Secures Federal Circuit Win for Safe Foods in Patent Dispute
May 08, 2026Haynes Boone Federal Circuit Practice Ranked 2nd of 1,000-Plus Firms in Patexia Report
November 04, 2025